Author:
Nwatu Samuel Ihuoma,Arum Edwin Chukwuemeka,Chime Ikechukwu P.
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper, therefore, is to amplify the imperativeness for a re-oriented regulatory approach that prioritizes constructive engagement with the regulated communities, harnessing the existing pool of savings and retention of market participation.
Design/methodology/approach
The paper adopts a doctrinal legal research design with data drawn from primary and secondary sources of law. The primary sources include case laws and statutes, and the secondary sources include book chapters, journal articles and other internet-sourced materials.
Findings
The paper finds that the status quo in Nigeria if left to continue would spell severe economic disaster for Nigeria’s securities administration, but a well-structured realignment of the regulations would boost the country’s securities market effectiveness.
Research limitations/implications
The research’s conclusions and suggestions might only be applicable to Nigeria’s particular situation with regard to capital market development and securities regulation. Other nations or locations with distinct regulatory systems, market structures and economic situations may not be able to immediately adapt it. When extending the research results outside of the Nigerian environment, caution should be exercised. For regulatory agencies and policymakers, the research offers insightful suggestions. The analysis may pinpoint certain areas where policy changes are required to address reoccurring problems and improve the chances for a healthy capital market.
Practical implications
For Nigeria’s regulatory frameworks controlling securities to be strengthened, this paper would be crucial. To make sure they are in line with global best practices, this entails examining and revising current laws, rules and standards. A stronger regulatory environment may also result from the implementation of harsher enforcement procedures and consequences for noncompliance. It is also required for creating market infrastructure, fostering market integration and cooperation, facilitating access to capital, monitoring and evaluation. It would also benefit investor education and protection.
Social implications
Addressing these persistent issues and potential remedies in Nigeria’s capital market development and securities regulation would have various advantageous social effects. These include improved market infrastructure, more financial inclusion, improved investment protection for investors and improved market openness and integrity. Such results will help Nigerian society as a whole by fostering economic expansion, job creation, wealth distribution and general social progress.
Originality/value
This paper is the original work of the authors and has not been published anywhere nor submitted to another journal for publication.
Subject
Law,General Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Reference36 articles.
1. Mandatory versus discretionary rule dichotomy in the harmonization of corporate governance codes: lessons for Nigeria;Journal of African Law,2019
2. The market for ‘lemons’: quality uncertainty and the market mechanism;The Quarterly Journal of Economics,1970
3. What exactly is market integrity? An analysis of one of the core objectives of securities regulation;Wm. and Mary Bus. L. Rev,2017
4. Legal and institutional preconditions for strong securities markets;UCLA Law Review,2001
5. Business a.m. (2020), “Nine delisted firms wipe off N165.11bn from NSE”, Business a.m, 20 January, available at: www.businessamlive.com/nine-delisted-firms-wipe-off-n165-11bn-from-nse/ (accessed 13 May 2023).