Author:
Watson John G.,Rao Korukonda Appa
Abstract
Attempts to position TQM in relation to well‐established
theoretical and conceptual constructs in management theory literature.
Argues that this needs to be done to prevent TQM from sharing the same
fate as other management fads that have, over the years, come, reigned
at the height of their glory, and finally disappeared into oblivion.
Towards this end, a dialectic analysis of TQM is presented by relating
it to four well‐established dichotomies in management theory:
co‐operative versus conflict ethic; organic versus mechanistic
structure; universal versus contingent orientation; and theory versus
practice focus. Presents implications and agenda for the future.
Subject
Strategy and Management,General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference48 articles.
1. 1. Ernst & Young and American Quality
Foundation,
International Quality Study: Top Line Findings, Authors, New York, NY, 1992.
2. 2. Lawler, E.E. III, Mohrman, S.A. and Ledford, G.E.,
Employee Involvement and
Total Quality Management: Practices and Results in Fortune 1000
Companies, Jossey‐Bass, San Francisco, CA,
1992.
3. 3. Krishnan, R., Shani, A.B., Grant, R.M. and Baer, R., “In
search of quality improvement: problems of design and implementation”,
Academy of Management Executive, Vol. 4 No. 7, 1993, pp. 7‐20.
4. 4. Reeves, C.A. and Bednar, D.A., “Defining quality: alternatives and implications”,
Academy of Management Review, Vol. 19 No. 3, 1994, pp. 419‐45.
5. 5. Chorn, N.H., “Total
quality management: Panacea or pitfall?”
International
Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, Vol.
21 No. 8, 1991, pp. 31‐5
.
Cited by
32 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献