Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to develop a conceptual framework that clarifies the construct of pay secrecy.Design/methodology/approachParalleling organizational justice research, two continua of pay information – a distributive continuum about pay raise outcomes and a procedural continuum of pay raise processes – are crossed to produce a 3 × 3 matrix with nine distinct forms of pay communication.FindingsDrawing on the substitutability effect from the organizational justice literature, the matrix highlights the importance of considering how the communication of different types of pay information interact with one another as individuals form pay perceptions.Research limitations/implicationsThe matrix framework illustrates that not only information content shapes pay perceptions, but also the extent to which different types of pay information are communicated, and how these different types of information interact. As with any conceptual framework, the current manuscript is limited by a lack of empirical testing.Practical implicationsManagers should be cognizant of the many different ways in which pay information can be communicated. A call is made to reconsider the use of traditionally binary terminology (secret or not) in favor of more accurate descriptions of the nuanced ways in which organizations communicate pay information.Originality/valueThe value of the pay communication matrix lies in the nine unique forms of pay communication arising from the interaction of two different forms of pay information – distributive (outcomes) and procedural (process).
Subject
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Industrial relations
Reference82 articles.
1. Adams, J.S. (1965), “Inequity in social exchange”, in Berkowitz, L. (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Academic Press, Vol. 2, pp. 267-299.
2. Best not to know: pay secrecy, employee voluntary turnover, and the conditioning effect of distributive justice;Academy of Management Journal,2021
3. Ambrose, M.L. and Arnaud, A. (2005), “Are procedural justice and distributive justice conceptually distinct?”, in Greenberg, J. and Colquitt, J.A. (Eds), Handbook of Organizational Justice, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, pp. 59-84.
4. The impact of pay secrecy on individual task performance;Personnel Psychology,2010
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献