Negotiating with technology: advancing the virtual in qualitative research methods

Author:

Kanjilal MahuyaORCID,Davis JenniferORCID,Arnull ElaineORCID

Abstract

PurposeThis study aims to describe key elements that are critical to virtual qualitative research especially while working with practitioners as participants.Design/methodology/approachThis paper takes a reflexive researcher approach using a case study to explore how researchers adopted a qualitative research approach using digital technology. We use five principles suggested by Boland et al. (2022) as a framework to consider and reflect on our experiences as researchers and those of our participants.FindingsWe highlight the gatekeeper’s support, trusted relationship with the organisations, interpersonal skills of interviewers, stringent measures of securing data and shared experiences of interviewee and interviewers helped complete virtual research. We recommend that four key factors such as digital competency, feasibility, flexibility and resilience should be considered while undertaking or commissioning virtual, qualitative research studies.Originality/valueSocial care practitioners and qualitative researchers increasingly negotiate with digital technologies to undertake their work. In this paper, we evidence how online qualitative approaches can be effective provided challenges are dealt with diligently in each stage of the research process.

Publisher

Emerald

Reference38 articles.

1. A COVID-19-19-era rapid review: using zoom and Skype for qualitative group research;Public Health Research and Practice,2022

2. Using thematic analysis in psychology;Qualitative Research in Psychology,2006

3. Zoom fatigue in the age of COVID-19-19;Journal of Social Work in the Global Community,2022

4. Chabra, C. (2021), “Live Transcription with speaker attribution now available in teams meetings for English”, available at: https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/microsoft-teams-blog/live-transcription-with-speaker-attribution-now-available-in/ba-p/2228817

5. Researching with qualitative methodologies in the time of coronavirus: clues and challenges;International Journal of Qualitative Methods,2023

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3