Current state of public sector performance management in seven selected countries

Author:

Lee Rhodes Mary,Biondi Lucia,Gomes Ricardo,Melo Ana I.,Ohemeng Frank,Perez‐Lopez Gemma,Rossi Andrea,Sutiyono Wayhu

Abstract

PurposeThis paper seeks to extend the analysis of performance management regimes by Bouckaert and Halligan to other countries in order to contribute to the developing theory of forms and challenges in public sector performance management.Design/methodology/approachThe state of performance management and the context in which it has evolved is assessed in seven different countries using dimensions drawn from Bouckaert and Halligan's work along with elements from earlier work by Pollitt and Bouckaert. These are summarized in a table and comparisons made to generate additional insights into the factors that influence the shape and speed of public management evolution.FindingsThe paper finds that the Bouckaert and Halligan framework for analyzing public sector performance management is useful, albeit with some modifications. Specifically, it finds that administrative culture is a key factor influencing the speed of reform and that the attitude of elites (politicians and civil servants, in most cases) is also a vital piece of the puzzle that was not included in Bouckaert and Halligan, but did appear in the earlier framework of Pollitt and Bouckaert. It also finds evidence that economic and political crises occurring together accelerate the introduction of integrated performance management systems, but that trust in government does not appear to be a significant factor. Finally, the paper observes that, absent political crisis/commitment, governments will prioritise “external” performance measures such as customer service, participation and transparency objectives over “internal” performance measures such as financial, staff management and whole of government reporting.Originality/valueThe countries studied provide a rare insight into lesser‐known performance management regimes and the use of the Bouckaert and Halligan framework allows for comparisons to earlier (and future) research. The findings will be of interest to scholars in public administration reform and performance management.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Strategy and Management,General Business, Management and Accounting

Reference107 articles.

1. Antwi, K.B., AnalouiF and Nana‐Agyekum, D. (2008), “Public sector reform in Sub‐Saharan Africa: what can be learnt from the civil service performance improvement programme in Ghana?”, Public Administration and Development, Vol. 28 No. 4, pp. 253‐64.

2. Appiah‐Du, K. (2012), “Enhancing government's policy management and decision making system: the case of Ghana's central governance reforms project”, Canadian Public Administration, (forthcoming).

3. Araújo, J.F.F.E. and Branco, J.F. (2009), “Implementing performance‐based management in the traditional bureaucracy of Portugal”, Public Administration, Vol. 87 No. 3, pp. 557‐73.

4. Asian Development Bank (ADB) (2004), Country Governance Assessment Report, Republic of Indonesia, Asian Development Bank, Manila.

5. Asociación Española de Contabilidad y Administración de Empresas (AECA) (2002), “Un sistema de Indicadores de Gestión para los Ayuntamientos”, Documento no. 26 de Contabilidad de Gestión, AECA, Madrid.

Cited by 50 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Performance Management Does Not Focus Enough on Ethics;Advances in Logistics, Operations, and Management Science;2024-08-30

2. The urban transport companies in Spain: analysis of efficiency with data envelopment analysis;European Journal of Innovation Management;2024-02-26

3. Cultural Competencies;Leadership Strategies for Effective Diversity Management;2023-11-24

4. The persistence of organizational performance problems the public services in Ghana: The perspective of societal culture;International Journal of Cross Cultural Management;2023-07-27

5. Performance management in Africa: an agenda for research;Management Research Review;2023-04-25

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3