Author:
Chowdhury Hedayet,Wodchis Walter,Laporte Audrey
Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to present a productivity measure for hospital services in Ontario.Design/methodology/approachThe study applied the Malmquist Productivity Index (MPI) to assess the efficiency of hospital services in Ontario, Canada, over the period 2003‐2006. The MPI was decomposed into efficiency change and technological change. Efficiency change was further decomposed into pure efficiency change and scale efficiency change. A bootstrapping technique was also used to obtain confidence intervals for the output oriented MPI and its decompositions.FindingsBy estimating confidence intervals it was found that a large number of hospitals did not achieve significant progress in terms of productivity. By taking geometric means of estimates for all years it was observed that while overall productivity and efficiency of hospitals in Ontario declined during the study period, technological progress increased at a rate of 5.95 percent on average.Practical implicationsThe present study helps to understand the productivity and technological change and change in technical efficiency in this vital sector of the economy, which is important for policy making identifying improvement opportunities in resource allocation. It was observed that Ontario hospitals did not improve the efficiency with which they employed their inputs (i.e. staff and supplies) over the study period; they did achieve gains through application of technologies.Originality/valueThe paper provides a thorough study on productivity growth of health care services in Ontario using a non‐parametric framework with bootstrapping. It also provides a robust measurement and analysis of the contributions of technology, size of operation and use of inputs to the performance of hospitals in Ontario.
Subject
Strategy and Management,General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference75 articles.
1. Banker, R.D., Conrad, R.F. and Strauss, R.P. (1986), “A comparative illustration of data envelopment analysis and translog methods: an illustrative study of hospital production”, Management Science, Vol. 32 No. 1, pp. 30‐44.
2. Biørn, E., Hagen, T.P., Iversen, T. and Magnussen, J. (2003), “The effect of activity‐based financing on hospital efficiency: a panel data analysis of DEA efficiency scores 1992‐2000”, Health Care Management Science, Vol. 6, pp. 271‐83.
3. Blank, J.L.T. and Valdmanis, V.G. (2010), “Environmental factors and productivity on Dutch hospitals: a semi‐parametric approach”, Health Care Management Science, Vol. 13, pp. 27‐34.
4. Burgess, J.F. and Wilson, P.W. (1995), “Decomposing hospital productivity changes, 1985‐1988: a nonparametric Malmquist approach”, The Journal of Productivity Analysis, Vol. 6, pp. 343‐63.
5. Canadian Institute for Health Information (2009), National Health Expenditure Trends 1975 to 2009, Canadian Institute for Health Information, Ottawa.
Cited by
29 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献