Author:
Barnes David,Matthew Hinton C.
Abstract
PurposePrevious empirical research into the performance measurement of exemplary e‐businesses has pointed to a lack of progress in developing distinctive performance metrics for e‐business and a failure to adopt best practice in performance management. The objective of this paper is to reconsider the evidence from that study by drawing on innovation adoption theories.Design/methodology/approachThe paper re‐examines the findings from case study‐based research that investigated leading e‐business performance measurement practices. The study suggests that there are limitations in analysing the findings using normative best practice, the dominant paradigm within performance management. Given that e‐business innovation relies on the adoption of multiple technologies this paper reconsiders the findings using the conceptual perspective of the innovation adoption literature.FindingsThe study highlights the importance of individual, cognitive, social and cultural influences in an organisation's operating environment on its willingness to adapt performance measurement metrics for online business activities. The findings point to the benefits available from incorporating new theoretic perspectives in performance measurement research.Research limitations/implicationsThe work points to a need to adopt a more context‐specific approach to the development of e‐business performance measurement. Furthermore, it indicates ways in which both the understanding and practice of performance measurement in e‐business can be advanced.Originality/valueThis paper highlights the limitations of current performance management literature as monopolised by normative best practice thinking, and argues for the need to incorporate other theoretical perspectives into performance management research.
Subject
Strategy and Management,General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference64 articles.
1. Ajzen, I. and Fishbein, M. (1973), “Attitudinal and normative variables as predictors of specific behavior”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 27 No. 1, pp. 41‐57.
2. Alfaro, J., Ortiz, A., Escoto, R. and Franco, R. (2002), “Performance measurement for e‐business enterprises”, International Journal of Business Performance Management, Vol. 4 No. 2, pp. 296‐315.
3. Argyris, C. and Schon, D. (1978), Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective, Addison‐Wesley, Reading, MA.
4. Barnes, D. and Hinton, M. (2008), The Benefits of E‐business Performance Measurement Systems, Elsevier, Oxford.
5. Barnes, D. and Hinton, M. (2009), “Discovering effective performance measurement for e‐business”, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Vol. 58 No. 4, pp. 329‐45.
Cited by
14 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献