Author:
Antony Jiju,Krishan Netasha,Cullen Donna,Kumar Maneesh
Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to critically evaluate whether Lean Six Sigma (LSS) can be a powerful business improvement methodology for improving the efficiency and effectiveness of higher education institutions (HEIs). The paper will also explore the fundamental challenges, barriers and critical success factors for the introduction and development of LSS in the HE context. The last part of the paper is to understand the role of tools and techniques for the sustainability of this initiative for making the HEIs more efficient and effective.Design/methodology/approachThe paper discusses whether LSS can be a useful and systematic approach to tackle operational and strategic issues within the HE industry. The authors use secondary data from literature to justify the need for this powerful approach and the benefits of adopting this business process improvement strategy within the HEIs.FindingsThe paper presents the challenges and barriers to be encountered during the introduction of LSS in the higher education sector, most useful tools and techniques for process improvement problems, success factors which are essential for the implementation and sustainability of LSS.Research limitations/implicationsThis is a very theoretical paper based on the existing literature and authors’ experiences in the HE sector. The next stage of the research is to carry out empirical studies in a number of HEIs and develop a practical and useful roadmap for the implementation and sustainability of LSS as a business process improvement methodology.Originality/valueThis paper makes an attempt to remove the myth that LSS is confined to manufacturing. It also demonstrates, through relevant existing literature and authors’ experiences, that LSS is equally applicable to public sector organisations and in particular HEIs. Although lean has been adopted by a few HEIs in the UK and abroad, very few HEIs have adopted the integrated LSS approach for waste reduction and variability reduction, which leads to superior performance and enhanced student satisfaction.
Subject
Strategy and Management,General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference15 articles.
1. Antony, J. (2004), “Six sigma in the UK service organisations: results from a pilot survey”, Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 19 No. 8, pp. 1006‐13.
2. Antony, J. and Snee, R. (2010), “Leading role”, Six Sigma Forum, ASQ, May, pp. 6‐12.
3. Bessant, J., Caffyn, S. and Glallagher, M. (2001), “An evolutionary model of continuous improvement behaviour”, Technovation, Vol. 21 No. 2, pp. 67‐77.
4. Crom, S. (2010), “Six sigma culture: better process and problem‐solving”, February, available at: www.isixsigma.com (accessed June 10, 2012).
5. Dale, B.G. and Smith, M. (1997), “Spectrum of quality management grid: development and use”, Managing Service Quality, Vol. 7 No. 6, pp. 307‐11.
Cited by
197 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Application of Lean Six Sigma(LSS) in Higher Education, in Kuwait-Case of AU College of Business;International Scientific Conference on Digitalization, Innovations & Sustainable Development: Trends and Business Perspectives 2023;2024-05-31
2. Leadership behaviours for Lean Six Sigma: Jordan as a case study;International Journal of Lean Six Sigma;2024-05-21
3. Unlocking the potential: a study on the role of operational excellence in Oman’s energy sector;International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management;2024-04-25
4. Universities’ internal governance and their efficiency: empirical evidence from Russia;International Transactions in Operational Research;2024-04-17
5. Challenges Facing TVET in Saudi Arabia and Road Map to Reform;International Journal of Vocational Education and Training Research;2024-04-02