Abstract
Purpose
– Earlier studies have found that the country characteristics play important role in measuring the corporate transparency. The purpose of this paper is to examine whether the firm-level determinants play an important role in corporate transparency measured as the quality of disclosed earnings across transitional Europe and what role an overall transparency measured by the Corruption Perception Index plays in it. This paper further tests if the market reacts similarly to discretionary and non-discretionary components of earnings across different groups of countries with respect to transparency.
Design/methodology/approach
– The financial and ownership data of listed companies in ten European countries is obtained from Amadeus. The transparency ratings are obtained from Transparency International. The sample consists of a panel of 2001 listed companies and modified Jones model of Dechow et al. (1995) is used to measure the quality of earnings.
Findings
– This paper shows that the firm-level determinants (except firm size) of the quality of earnings are different among different groups made on the basis of transparency ratings. However, the determinants of the quality of earnings are not different within each group. The ownership structure of companies plays important role in determining the quality of earnings in most transparent countries whereas financial factors play significant role in least transparent countries. The markets respond positively to earnings quality in most transparent group of countries.
Research limitations/implications
– The results of this study provide interesting basis for future research on economic and social integration of Europe. Although the policy makers are trying to integrate the countries through common Laws and decrees but examining the firm-level factors such as size, growth and ownership are still important. The regulators should address the issue of corporate transparency in Europe by looking at the importance of these factors with respect to overall transparency.
Originality/value
– This study extends the knowledge, not only for academicians and investors but for policy makers as well. This study re-emphasizes the role of country-level transparency and firm-level determinants of the corporate transparency within Europe.
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,Development,Accounting
Reference50 articles.
1. Agarwal, A.
and
Knoeber, C.
(1996), “Firm performance and mechanism to control agency problems between managers and shareholders”,
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis
, Vol. 31 No. 3, pp. 377-397.
2. Ali, A.
and
Hwang, L.S.
(2000), “Country specific factors related to financial reporting and the value relevance of accounting data”,
Journal of Accounting Research
, Vol. 38 No. 1, pp. 1-21.
3. Atiase, R.K.
(1985), “Pre-disclosure information, firm capitalization and security price behaviour around earnings announcements”,
Journal of Accounting Research
, Vol. 23 No. 1, pp. 21-36.
4. Ball, R.
,
Kothari, S.P.
and
Robin, A.
(2000), “The effect of institutional factors on properties of accounting earnings: international evidence”,
Journal of Accounting and Economics
, Vol. 29 No. 1, pp. 1-51.
5. Berle, A.
and
Means, G.
(1932),
The Modern Corporation and Private Property
, Hartcourt, Brace and World, New York, NY, (reprinted in 1991 by Transaction Publishers, NJ).
Cited by
15 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献