The rise of Asian elephants and tigers: what makes Indian and Chinese firms competitive?

Author:

Berning Sue Claire

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this study is to critically analyze the resources and determinants of capabilities and attributes which enable Indian and Chinese firms to develop competitive advantages. The leading research question asks whether the traditional concept of competitiveness can capture Indian and Chinese firms’ competitiveness.Design/methodology/approachA systematic and comprehensive literature review of 62 studies published between 1994 and 2016 with focus on Indian and Chinese firms is conducted to examine the nature and contextual conditions of their competitiveness, as well as the research methods and underlying theories.FindingsTurning disadvantages into advantages and shifting the points of take-off are the most outstanding findings. Moreover, the majority of 88 per cent of the examined studies concludes that Indian and Chinese firms built nontraditional competitive strengths.Research limitations/implicationsBecause of the unconventional competitiveness of Indian and Chinese firms, existing theoretical perspectives and research settings need revisions and extensions.Originality/valueUnlike most extant research on India and China, which studies country- or industry-level variables using aggregate data, this paper reveals distinct patterns and similarities and differences of firm-level characteristics. In addition, by exclusively focusing on Indian and Chinese firms’ competitiveness, conclusions about their uniqueness and generalizability can be drawn.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Strategy and Management,General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,Business and International Management

Reference99 articles.

1. Globalization of Chinese firms: theoretical universalism or particularism;Management Organization Review,2011

2. Chinese and Indian multinationals: a Firm-Level analysis of their investments in Europe;Global Economic Review,2015

3. Multinational enterprises from emerging economies: what theories suggest, what evidence shows;Economia e Politica Industriale,2015

4. Emerging countries’ multinational companies investing in developed countries: at odds with the HOS paradigm?;European Journal of Comparative Economics,2013

5. Awakening giants, Feet of clay: a comparative assessment of the rise of China and India;Journal of South Asian Development,2006

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3