A review of fast-food companies' approaches to animal welfare

Author:

Jones Peter,Comfort Daphne

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this review paper is to extend the literature on animal welfare in the hospitality industry by exploring how some of the major fast-food companies have publicly addressed this issue.Design/methodology/approachThe paper reviews, and reflects on, the animal welfare statements and policies posted on the Internet by five major fast-food companies, namely, Yum! Brands, Restaurant Brands International, McDonald's, Domino's Pizza Group and Subway.FindingsThe findings reveal that four interlinked themes, namely, strategic corporate commitment, a focus on supply chains, policies on specific categories of animals and food products, and auditing, illustrated the selected companies approach to animal welfare. The authors also raise a number of issues about the selected companies' approaches to animal welfare including the aspirational nature of their commitments, the emphasis on regular audits, the role of external assurance in the reporting process, the role of animal welfare pressure groups and campaigns, and the impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).Research limitations/implicationsThe paper's empirical material is drawn from the corporate websites of five fast-food companies, but the paper has theoretical and practical implications and provides a platform for future research.Originality/valueThe paper offers a simple review of the way five major fast-food companies have addressed the issue of animal welfare.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management

Reference48 articles.

1. Fast food and animal rights: an examination and assessment of the industry's response to social pressure;Business and Society Review,2008

2. American Veterinary Medical Association (2010), “Animal welfare! What is it?”, available at: https://www.avma.org/resources/animal-health-welfare/animal-welfare-what-it (accessed 24 July 2020).

3. Amos, N. and Sullivan, R. (2019), “The business Benchmark on farm animal welfare report 2019”, available at: https://www.bbfaw.com/media/1788/bbfaw_full-report_2019.pdf (accessed 29 September 2020).

4. Business Benchmark on Farm Animal Welfare (2020), “Global investor collaboration on farm animal welfare”, available at: https://www.bbfaw.com/investors/investor-collaboration/ (accessed 21 October 2020).

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3