Approaching disaster management through social learning

Author:

O'Brien Geoff,O'Keefe Phil,Gadema Zaina,Swords Jon

Abstract

PurposeCoping with and adjusting to disruptive challenges has always been a characteristic of human development. Formalisation of this has led to the emergence of a number approaches addressing disruptive challenges. Often formalised practice has a narrow focus. Increasingly complex challenges require a refocus of formalised approaches. Drawing from these approaches, the purpose of this paper is to posit that a greater focus on preparedness through pre‐disaster planning is needed for a more holistic approach to disaster management.Design/methodology/approachThe paper reviews the evolution of disaster management thinking and practice and proposes that changes are needed to the dominant disaster management model. These changes are drawn from a number of alternative perspectives. Based on the uncertainties surrounding complex or “wicked” problems, for example, climate change and variability, this paper develops a more holistic approach.FindingsResponding to “wicked problems” requires a greater focus on preparedness. In terms of disaster risk reduction a greater emphasis on pre‐disaster planning is needed driven by social learning processes.Originality/valueFaced with an increasingly uncertain and complex future, current approaches to conceptualising disaster management are inadequate. This paper develops an approach that is likely to be more effective.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Health (social science)

Reference33 articles.

1. Alexander, D. (1993), Natural Disasters, UCL Press, London.

2. Alexander, D. (2005), “Towards the development of a standard in emergency planning”, Disaster Prevention and Management, Vol. 14 No. 2, pp. 158‐75.

3. Bermann, D.A. and Redlener, I. (2006), “National preparedness planning: the historical context and current state of the US public's readiness”, Journal of International Affairs, Vol. 59 No. 2, pp. 87‐103.

4. Burton, I., Kates, R.W. and White, G.F. (1993), Environment as Hazard, Guildford Press, London.

5. de Marchi, B. and Ravetz, J.R. (1999), “Risk management and governance: a post‐normal science approach”, Futures, Vol. 31 No. 7, pp. 743‐57.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3