Beyond social capital: a capability approach to understanding Refugee Community Organisations and other providers for “hard to reach” groups

Author:

Clarke Jennifer

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to explore the value of the “capability approach” as an alternative framework for understanding and conceptualising the role of Refugee Community Organisations (RCOs) and other providers for groups conventionally considered “hard to reach”. Design/methodology/approach – A study of the education services of RCOs, drawing primarily on semi-structured interviews with 71 users, is put forward as a case study for how the capability approach can be operationalised. Findings – The capability approach is found to offer various valuable insights, relating to its appreciation of the multi-dimensional nature of human wellbeing, the significance of individual diversity, and the importance of human agency. Research limitations/implications – The case study is based on a relatively small purposive sample, and may have limited external validity. As the research design proved strong for exploring how RCOs develop their users’ capabilities but weak for exploring if and how they may also constrict them, further research in this area is required. Practical implications – A number of valuable attributes of the capability approach are highlighted for broadening the understanding, the role of RCOs and other service providers. Social implications – The paper outlines the potential of the capability approach to contribute to policymaking related to RCOs and other providers, and to debates relating to social exclusion, cohesion and integration. Originality/value – The paper draws attention to the value of the capability approach within the field of migration research.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Law,Sociology and Political Science,Health (social science)

Reference39 articles.

1. Adefila, A.A. (2010), “The role of voluntary organisations in developing the capabilities of vulnerable young people”, PhD thesis, University of Warwick, Coventry.

2. Ager, A. and Strang, A. (2008), “Understanding integration: a conceptual framework”, Journal of Refugee Studies, Vol. 21 No. 2, pp. 166-91.

3. Atfield, G. , Brahmbhatt, K. and O'Toole, T. (2007), Refugees Experiences of Integration, University of Birmingham and Refugee Council, Birmingham.

4. Briones, L. (2009), “Reconsidering the migration – development link: capability and livelihood in Filipina experiences of domestic work in Paris population”, Space and Place, Vol. 15 No. 2, pp. 133-45.

5. Castles, S. , Korac, M. , Vasta, E. and Vertovec, S. (2002), Integration: Mapping the Field, Centre on Migration, Policy, and Society and Refugee Studies Centre, Oxford.

Cited by 15 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3