Author:
Sharma Piyush,Erramilli M. Krishna,Chung Cindy,Sivakumaran Bharadhwaj
Abstract
Purpose
– This paper aims to introduce a comprehensive conceptual framework to study the influence of “consumer ambivalence towards contraception” and “intercourse frequency” along with attitudes toward contraception and satisfaction with most familiar contraceptive method, on contraceptive usage and intentions.
Design/methodology/approach
– A team of trained female interviewers used a structured questionnaire to conduct a clinic-intercept survey with 588 sexually active female consumers in two major hospitals and six randomly chosen clinics in Singapore (response rate = 29 per cent).
Findings
– Consumer attitudes toward contraception, satisfaction with most familiar contraceptive method and intercourse frequency have a positive effect on contraceptive usage. Consumer ambivalence toward contraception has a negative effect on usage and intentions and it negatively moderates the effects of attitudes, satisfaction and intercourse frequency.
Research limitations/implications
– This paper explores the role of consumer ambivalence toward contraception in general and not toward specific contraceptive methods. Moreover, it does not measure differences in the impact of personal cultural values and orientations of the participants on contraceptive usage. These could be useful avenues for future research.
Practical implications
– By clarifying the reasons for inconsistent contraception usage, this research will help health-care professionals, social workers and welfare organizations develop more focused consumer education programs and communication campaigns to reduce consumer ambivalence about contraception and improve contraception usage rates.
Originality/value
– This paper extends prior research on consumer ambivalence by exploring its direct and moderating impact on contraceptive usage, an important issue for female health and well-being. The authors also show intercourse frequency as a moderator in this process.
Reference84 articles.
1. Acharya, D.R.
,
Bhattarai, R.
,
Poobalan, A.
,
van Teijlingen, E.R.
and
Chapman, G.
(2010), “Factors associated with teenage pregnancy in South Asia: a systematic review”,
Health Sciences Journal
, Vol. 4 No. 1, pp. 3-14.
2. Anderson, J.C.
and
Gerbing, D.W.
(1988), “Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two step approach”,
Psychological Bulletin
, Vol. 103 No. 3, pp. 411-423.
3. Armitage, C.J.
(2003), “Beyond attitudinal ambivalence: effects of belief homogeneity on attitude-intention-behaviour relations”,
European Journal of Social Psychology
, Vol. 33 No. 4, pp. 551-563.
4. Armitage, C.J.
and
Conner, M.
(2000), “Attitudinal ambivalence: a test of three key hypotheses”,
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
, Vol. 26 No. 11, pp. 1421-1432.
5. Bagozzi, R.P.
and
Yi, Y.
(1988), “On the evaluation of structural equation models”,
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Sciences
, Vol. 16 No. 1, pp. 74-84.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献