Quality improvement in hospice settings: perceptions of leaders

Author:

Singh Jitendra,Sillerud Brandi,Omar Marah

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to explore and examine attitudes and perceptions of leaders on application of quality improvement (QI) strategies in a palliative and hospice care organization. Design/methodology/approach This study employed qualitative research methodology where leaders working in a hospice and palliative care organization were invited to participate in 45–60-min-long semi-structured interview. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Qualitative content analysis was utilized to analyze the data collected during participant interviews. Findings Seven leaders participated in the interviews. Five themes were developed from data analysis: patient-centered care; continuous QI; leadership involvement and commitment; communication as a foundation for QI; and perceived barriers. Data analysis suggests that use of QI approach in palliative and hospice care enhances the quality of care provided for patients, and can help improve patient satisfaction. Practical implications Because there is a paucity of research on implementation of QI strategies in hospice and palliative care settings, this research can have wide practical implications. This research can provide useful practical tips to leaders as they work on implementing QI projects in their organization. Originality/value This manuscript can be of value to leaders, administrators and academicians who are interested in applying QI principles to healthcare processes especially in palliative and hospice care settings. Ability to work with others, solid communication and involvement of employees from all levels can help in streamlining current systems of care.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Health Policy,General Business, Management and Accounting

Reference30 articles.

1. Austin, B.J. and Fleisher, L.K. (2003), “Financing end of life care: challenges for an aging population”, available at: www.hcfo.org/files/hcfo/eolcare.pdf (accessed February 10, 2019).

2. What is ‘quality improvement’ and how can it transform healthcare?;BMJ Quality and Safety,2007

3. Member checking: a tool to enhance trustworthiness or merely a nod to validation?;Qualitative Health Research,2016

4. Domains associated with successful quality improvement in healthcare – a nationwide case study;BMC Health Services Research,2017

5. Broyles, I., Li, Q., Zheng, T., Frank, J., Sherif, N. and Rokoske, F. (2016), “The emerging picture of quality of care in hospice”, available at: www.rti.org/sites/default/files/rti_issue_brief_hospice_quality_care.pdf (accessed March 12, 2019).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3