Author:
Hurst Keith,Kelley Patterson Deirdre
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to discuss the issues relating to getting the right health and social care staff with the right skills in the right place at the right time and at the right price.
Design/methodology/approach
– Key points arising from several master-classes with health and social care managers, supported by a literature review, generated remarkable insights into health and social care workforce planning and development (WP&D).
Findings
– Flawed methods and overwhelming data are major barriers to health and social care WP&D. Inefficient and ineffective WP&D policy and practice, therefore, may lead to inappropriate care teams, which in turn lead to sub-optimal and costly health and social care. Increasing health and social care demand and service re-design, as the population grows and ages, and services move from hospital to community, means that workforce planners face several challenges. Issues that drive and restrain their health and social care WP&D efforts are lucid and compelling, which leave planners in no doubt what is expected if they are to succeed and health and social care is to develop. One main barrier they face is that although WP&D definitions and models in the literature are logical, clear and effective, they are imperfect, so planners do not always have comprehensive tools or data to help them determine the ideal workforce. They face other barriers. First, WP&D can be fragmented and uni-disciplinary when modern health and social care is integrating. Second, recruitment and retention problems can easily stymie planners’ best endeavours because the people that services need (i.e. staff with the right skills), even if they exist, are not evenly distributed throughout the country.
Practical implications
– This paper underlines triangulated workforce demand and supply methods (described in the paper), which help planners to equalise workloads among disparate groups and isolated practitioners – an important job satisfaction and staff retention issue. Regular and systematic workforce reviews help planners to justify their staffing establishments; it seems vital, therefore, that they have robust methods and supporting data at their fingertips.
Originality/value
– This paper stock-takes the latest health and social care workforce planning and development issues.
Subject
Health Policy,General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference35 articles.
1. Anderson, L.
(1997), “The role and resources required for the introduction of ward assistants using the GRASP systems workload method: a quantitative study”, Journal of Nursing Management, Vol. 5 No. 2, pp. 11-17.
2. Appleby, J.
and
Thomas, A.
(2000), “Measuring performance in the NHS: what really matters”, British Medical Journal, Vol. 320 No. 7247, pp. 1464-1467.
3. Audit Commission
(1992), Caring Systems, HMSO, London.
4. Audit Commission
(1999), First Assessment. A Review of District Nursing Services in England and Wales, HMSO, London.
5. Bagust, A.
,
Prescott, J.
and
Smith, A.
(1988), “Numbering the nurses”, Health Service Journal, Vol. 98 No. 5108, pp. 765-766.
Cited by
12 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献