Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to determine the relative influence of the different domains of healthcare quality from the Care Experience Feedback Improvement Tool (CEFIT) and identify key predictors of healthcare quality from the patients’ perspective. Measurement is necessary to determine whether the quality of healthcare is improving. The CEFIT was developed as a brief measure of patient experience. It is important to determine the relative influence of the different domains of healthcare quality to further clarify how the CEFIT can be used and identify key predictors of healthcare quality from the patients’ perspective.Design/methodology/approachIn sum, 802 people with a healthcare experience during the previous 12 months were telephoned to complete the CEFIT questions and an additional 11-point global rating of patient experience. To estimate the influence of different domains of healthcare quality on patient overall ratings of quality of healthcare experience, the authors regressed the overall rating of patient experience with each component of quality (safety, effectiveness, timely, caring, enables system navigation and person-centred).FindingsThe authors found that all of the domains of the CEFIT influenced patient experience ratings of healthcare quality. Specifically, results show the degree of influence, the impact of demographics and how high scores for overall rating of patient experience can be predicted.Originality/valueThe findings suggest that all of the CEFIT domains are important in terms of capturing the wholeness of the patient experience of healthcare quality to direct local quality improvement.
Subject
Health Policy,General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference47 articles.
1. Predictors of patients’ experiences of nursing care in medical-surgical wards;International Journal of Nursing Practice,2004
2. Patient safety, satisfaction, and quality of hospital care: cross sectional surveys of nurses and patients in 12 countries in Europe and the United States;BMJ,2012
3. Patients’ and relatives’ experiences and perspectives of ‘good’ and ‘not so good’ quality care;Journal of Advanced Nursing,2001
4. Care and service trajectories for people with intellectual disabilities: defining its course and quality determinants from the client’s perspective;Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities,2009
5. Do the Institute of Medicine’s (IOM’s) dimensions of quality capture the current meaning of quality in health care?–An integrative review;Journal of Research in Nursing,2012
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献