“Catching them young” – some reflections on the meaning of the age of criminal responsibility in England and Wales

Author:

Bateman Tim

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to explore the tension between government protestations that youth justice policy is evidence-led and what the evidence implies in the context of the age of criminal responsibility. Design/methodology/approach – The paper takes the form of a conceptual analysis of government policy and the evidence base. Findings – The paper concludes that the current low age of criminal responsibility in England and Wales can be understood as a manifestation of the influence of underclass theory on successive governments. Research limitations/implications – The paper is not based on primary research. Practical implications – The arguments adduced help to explain the reluctance of government to countenance any increase in the age of criminal responsibility. Social implications – The analysis might help inform approaches adopted by youth justice policy makers, practitioners and academics with an interest in seeking a rise in the age of criminal responsibility. Originality/value – The paper offers an original analysis of government intransigence on an important social issue.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Community and Home Care,Law,Safety Research

Reference61 articles.

1. All Party Parliamentary Group for Children (2010), Children and Young People in the Youth Justice System: Report of Seminars Organised by the All Party Parliamentary Group for Children 2009/10, National Children's Bureau, London.

2. All Party Parliamentary Group on Women in the Penal System (2012), Keeping Girls out of the Penal System, Howard League for Penal Reform, London.

3. Arthur, R. (2012), “Rethinking the criminal responsibility of young people in England”, European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice, Vol. 20 No. 1, pp. 13-29.

4. Bandalli, S. (2000), “Children, responsibility and the new youth justice”, in Goldson, B. (Ed.), The New Youth Justice, Russell House, Lyme Regis.

5. Barnardo's (2010), From Playground to Prison: The Case for Reviewing the Age of Criminal Responsibility, Barnardo's, Ilford.

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3