Navigating the political waters: a comparative review of two influential political reference resources

Author:

Gould Gretchen

Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this article is to review the 2012 editions of two political reference handbooks judged influential as current reference sources for the study of politics and politically related topics. Design/methodology/approach - The coverage, organization of information, and the ease of use and understanding of information presented in the political reference handbooks is examined and comparatively reviewed. Findings - These two political reference handbook titles have many similarities, but also differences. The Almanac of American Politics contains more detailed information but utilizes a more complicated approach in the analysis, classification, and ranking of votes. Politics in America does not provide in-depth information, but its approach in the analysis, classification, and ranking of votes is simple, straightforward, and easy to understand. Research limitations/implications - While online versions of these resources are available, this review concerns solely the print editions. Originality/value - This paper provides a comparative overview and analysis of two important political reference handbooks which will be of value to information professionals and others seeking to perform reference in the area of politics and political science.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

General Economics, Econometrics and Finance

Reference8 articles.

1. Barone, M. and Cohen, R.E. (2007), The Almanac of American Politics 2008, National Journal Group, Washington, DC.

2. Barone, M. and McCutcheon, C. (2011), The Almanac of American Politics, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.

3. Barone, M. , Ujifusa, G. and Matthews, D. (1972), The Almanac of American Politics: The Senators, the Representatives – their Records, States, and Districts, Gambit, Boston, MA.

4. Bicknell, J. and Meyers, D. (Eds) (2011), Politics in America 2012: the 112th Congress, CQ-Roll Call, Washington, DC.

5. Borosage, R. (2008), “The emerging-center left majority”, The American Prospect, available at: http://prospect.org/article/emerging-center-left-majority (accessed October 2013).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3