Standardising assessment instruments and care planning in Ireland

Author:

Van Lente Eric,Power Martin

Abstract

Purpose – Scoping of instruments in use for assessment of needs and the practices that surround care planning in residential care for older people in Ireland, in the wake of the introduction of national standards. The paper discusses these issues. Design/methodology/approach – Survey of care providers using an online/postal questionnaire, developed from the domains of need outlined in the standards. Findings – There is wide variation in the use of standardised instruments for assessment. Within some domains, standardised instruments enjoy near universal usage. However, within other domains, standardised instruments are often absent, external professional input and/or guidelines dominate and/or instruments have been adapted in-house. Practices surrounding care planning are largely homogeneous and the preserve of medical professionals. Research limitations/implications – This research was confined to the Republic of Ireland, limiting generalisation. The self-selecting nature of participants must also be considered. Further research could include, examining how, over time, the standards are shaping care practice, particularly in relation to interdisciplinary working and person-centred care. Practical implications – The non-prescriptive nature of the standards presents a challenge to care providers in selecting appropriate standardised instruments for assessment. In addition, medical dominance of care planning limits the extent to which care plans can enhance the provision of interdisciplinary and person-centred care. Originality/value – This paper contributes to a growing literature on standardisation of assessment and care planning, provides a reference point for comparison with other nations and, in an Irish context, addresses an area that has received little attention to-date. As such, it is of interest to practitioners, care providers and regulators.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Care Planning,Community and Home Care,Gerontology

Reference68 articles.

1. Abdelhafiz, A. and Austin, C. (2003), “Visual factors should be assessed in older people presenting with falls of hip fracture”, Age and Ageing, Vol. 32 No. 1, pp. 26-30.

2. Bernabei, R. , Landi, F. , Onder, G. , Liperoti, R. and Gambassi, G. (2008), “Second and third generation assessment instruments: the birth of standardisation in geriatric care”, Journal of Gerontology, Vol. 63 No. 3, pp. 308-13.

3. Bernabei, R. , Murphy, K. , Frijters, D. , DuPaquier, J.N. and Gardent, H. (1997), “Variation in training programmes for Resident Assessment Instrument implementation”, Age and Ageing, Vol. 26 No. S2, pp. 31-5.

4. Bower, H. , Clark, A. , Crosby, G. , Easterbrook, L. , Macadam, A. , MacDonald, R. , Macfarlane, A. , Maclean, M. , Patel, M. , Runnicles, D. , Oshinaike, T. and Smith, C. (2009), Older People's Vision of Long-Term Care, Joseph Rowntree Foundation, York.

5. Brink, P. and Stones, M. (2007), “Examination of the relationship among hearing impairment, linguistic communication, mood and social engagement of residents in complex continuing-care facilities”, The Gerontologist, Vol. 47 No. 5, pp. 633-41.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3