Abstract
PurposeThis study aims to contribute to the open innovation (OI) literature by investigating the transitions between three phases in the OI process (i.e. idea generation, idea promotion and idea realization) and how these are moderated by different forms of shared leadership (i.e. transactional, and transformational) as perceived by participants in the OI process.Design/methodology/approachThe authors tested a set of hypotheses using moderated mediation PLS-SEM models on a bootstrapped sample of OI participants (N = 173).FindingsThe authors found a direct relationship between idea generation and realization, as well as indirectly through idea promotion. This study implies that the promotion of ideas by participants can be beneficial in inter-organizational OI teams, as promotion of ideas provides a linkage between the generation of ideas and the idea realization phase. However, while shared leadership has been shown to be beneficial in conventional teams, the authors found evidence that this may not be the case in inter-organizational OI teams. Higher levels of shared transformational leadership from colleagues with whom employees do not share the same organizational background may hamper the promotion of ideas.Originality/valueIn contrast to the mainstream view, the authors found significant evidence that transformational shared leadership negatively moderates the direct relationship between idea generation and the promotion of ideas and the indirect relationship between idea generation and realization via idea promotion.
Reference87 articles.
1. Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach;Psychological Bulletin,1988
2. Shopfloor innovation: facilitating the suggestion and implementation of ideas;Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology,2000
3. Assessing construct validity in organizational research;Administrative Science Quarterly,1991
4. The partial least squares approach to causal modeling: personal computer adoption and use as illustration;Technology Studies,1995