Parent-based early childhood interventions do make a difference! A rebuttal to See and Gorard (2015a)

Author:

Goldstein Keith,Vatalaro Angela,Yair Gad

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to refute See and Gorard’s paper published in this journal in 2015 which argues that parent-based interventions for school readiness are ineffective. Design/methodology/approach Methods and results from 107 studies that were cited in See and Gorard (2015a) and associated reports were reviewed. Evaluations were made based on comparing the original studies with the summaries of those studies in the publication. Findings In this rebuttal, the authors show how See and Gorard erred to correctly report methods, sample sizes, outcomes measured, and the actual results of prior research. Practical implications The authors suggest that See and Gorard do not provide solid evidence within their article to back up their claims about parent intervention programs. This rigorous review of See and Gorard’s primary sources reveals that the empirical evidence stands contrary to the claims being made. See and Gorard inaccurately reviewed publications which contradict their conclusions, and they relied on a vast amount of unpublished papers by students to support their claims. Originality/value The authors demonstrate how See and Gorard misapplied their own standards of evaluation; the authors claim that their source materials contradict the “finding” they purport to present; and the authors argue that they chose lesser known studies when more reputable ones were available.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Law,Sociology and Political Science,Developmental and Educational Psychology,Education,Health (social science)

Reference84 articles.

1. Benefits and costs of prevention and early intervention programs for youth,2004

2. Progressing Parental Engagement in the ACT: Our Evidence Base. Measuring Parental Engagement;Australian Research Alliance for Children and Youth,2015

3. Avellar, S., Paulsell, D., Sama-Miller, E. and Del Grosso, P. (2014), “Home visiting evidence of effectiveness review: executive summary”, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, US Department of Health and Human Services. Washington, DC, available at: https://homvee.acf.hhs.gov/HomVEE_Executive_Summary_2013.pdf

4. Effectiveness of home visiting in improving child health and reducing child maltreatment;Pediatrics,2013

5. The effects of the home instruction program for preschool youngsters (HIPPY) on children’s school performance at the end of the program and one year later;Early Childhood Research Quarterly,1998

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3