Flexible benchmarking: a new reference model

Author:

Albertin Marcos Ronaldo,Pontes Heraclito Lopes Jaguaribe,Frota Enio Rabelo,Assunção Matheus Barros

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to describe and propose a new way to do benchmarking. It describes an explanatory case study whereby data are collected through an internet benchmarking system with multi-criteria performance. Design/methodology/approach – The research methodology was to conduct a literature review on international journals about evolution, typology and trends of benchmarking. Through a third year case study of Internet Benchmarking and Monitoring System of Productive Arrangements System the authors describe and propose a flexible benchmarking model. Findings – The paper provides empirical insights about a new model of flexible benchmarking taking into account different demands, whereby partners’ data are collected and processed according to their needs. Research limitations/implications – For monitoring and trending analysis more data and time is needed. These three-year applications show that it takes a long time to build a database that can be meaningful for benchmarking and monitoring purposes management. It also requires management maturity, performance system and finally procedures to invite companies to collect and input online data. Practical implications – The paper describes a flexible benchmarking, detailing its features in the form of a case study. The gap analysis shows the individual and collective gaps and requirements. Examples of practical use and reports generated “online” are presented. Originality/value – The paper presents a new potential for the use of benchmarking tools. It is expected to contribute to the academic area, describing ways to achieve greater potential in the use of benchmarking tools, proposing a new way to do benchmarking.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Business and International Management,Strategy and Management

Reference24 articles.

1. Ahmed, P.K. and Rafiq, M. (1998), “Integrated benchmarking: a holistic examination of select techniques for benchmarking analysis”, Benchmarking: An International Journal , Vol. 5 No. 3, pp. 225-242.

2. Albertin, M.R. (2003), “O processo de governança de arranjos produtivos: O caso da cadeia automotiva do RGS”, UFGRS, Tese de doutorado, Porto Alegre.

3. Altenburg, T. , Hillebrand, W. and Meyer-stamer, J. (1998), “Building systemic competitiveness”, reports and working papers, German Development Institute, Berlin.

4. Andersen, B. and Pettersen, P. (1994), “The basics of benchmarking: what, when, how, and why”, Pacific Conference on Manufacturing, Djakarta.

5. Bhutta, K.S. and Huq, F. (1999), “Benchmarking – best practices: an integrated approach”, Benchmarking: An International Journal , Vol. 6 No. 3, pp. 254-268.

Cited by 11 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. SAĞLIK BAKANLIĞINA BAĞLI AĞIZ VE DİŞ SAĞLIĞI MERKEZLERİNİN PERFORMANSLARININ STRATEJİK YÖNETİM ARACI KIYASLAMA İLE BELİRLENMESİ;Stratejik Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi;2022-03-23

2. Contractual practices between the consultant and employer in Chinese BIM-enabled construction projects;Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management;2019-07-22

3. Developing a benchmarking system for architecture design firms;Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management;2019-02-18

4. Fault-Tolerant Design;Fault-Tolerant Design and Control of Automated Vehicles and Processes;2019-02-15

5. Identification and evaluation of determinants of competitiveness in the Indian auto-component industry;Benchmarking: An International Journal;2019-01-29

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3