Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to review evidence related to the factors that influence people's understanding of health information and how miscommunication of health information can jeopardize people's health.Design/methodology/approachA literature review was conducted of English language articles, cited in major literature databases from the last 40 years, which describe factors related to comprehension of health information. A total of 93 articles were included.FindingsThe paper finds that health communication should take into consideration the role of the following factors on the processing and interpretation of health information: health literacy, format presentation of information, and human cognitive biases and affective/personal influences.Practical implicationsHealth communication is a major component of health care. Every health care encounter involves exchange of information, which is intended to enhance people's knowledge in order to assist them to make an informed decision about their health care. However, the mere act of providing information does not guarantee comprehension. People's comprehension of information depends on several factors, including health literacy and numeracy skills, the format presentation of health information and human cognitive biases in the information processing and interpretation. Ineffective health communication can result in a wide range of direct and indirect health consequences including failure to understand and comply with treatment, poorer health status, increased risk of injuries, increased hospitalization, and decreased use of preventive services.Originality/valueThis paper provides health professionals and educators with an overview of important issues related to health communication and highlights strategies that facilitate effective communication to help people to make informed decisions about their health care.
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Education
Reference98 articles.
1. Adams, A.M. and Smith, A.F. (2001), “Risk perception and communication: recent developments and implications for anaesthesia”, Anaesthesia, Vol. 56, pp. 745‐55.
2. Avis, N.E., Smith, K.W. and McKinlay, J. (1989), “Accuracy of perceptions of heart attack risk: what influences perceptions and can't they be changed?”, American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 79, pp. 1608‐12.
3. Ad Hoc Committee on Health Literacy for the Council on Scientific Affairs, American Medical Association (1999), “Health literacy: report of the Council on Scientific Affairs”, Journal of American Medical Association, Vol. 281 No. 6, pp. 552‐7.
4. American College of Physicians Foundation (2003), Executive Summary: Strategies to Improve Health Care by Removing Communication Barriers, American College of Physicians Foundation, Philadelphia, PA.
5. Andrus, M.R. and Roth, M. (2002), “Health literacy: a review”, Pharmacotherapy, Vol. 22 No. 3, pp. 282‐302.
Cited by
41 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献