Abstract
Examines some of the constraints on the effective evaluation of the health‐promoting school, particularly where a whole‐school approach is used, and outcomes are not behaviour‐specific. Considers the components of a successful school health intervention, and identifies some of the difficulties in achieving comprehensive evaluation. Explores the advantages of randomisation and controlled studies and identifies some limitations of these approaches, when the main aims are to examine process and non‐specific behavioural outcomes. Identifies some common errors that have been made in school‐based evaluations in the past and argues that the use of multiple methods of evaluation are necessary for a multi‐factorial whole‐school approach to teaching and learning about health. Discusses the recommendations for future evaluation by the WHO European Working Group on Health Promotion Evaluation.
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Education
Reference19 articles.
1. Allensworth, D.D. (1993), “Health education: state of the art”, Journal of School Health, Vol. 63 No. 1, pp. 14‐20.
2. Allensworth, D.D. (1994), “The research base for innovative practice in school health education at secondary level”, Journal of School Health, Vol. 64 No. 5, pp. 180‐7.
3. Baric, L. (1991), “Health‐promoting schools: evaluation and auditing”, Journal of the Institute of Health Education, Vol. 29 No. 4, pp. 114‐20.
4. Bremberg, S. (1991), “Does school health education affect the health of students? A literature review”, in Nutbeam, D., Hagland, B., Farley, P. and Tillgren, P. (Eds), Youth Health Promotion: From Theory to Practice in School and Community, Forbes Publications.
5. Denman, S (1994), “Do schools provide an opportunity for meeting the Health of the Nation targets?”, Journal of Public Health Medicine, Vol. 16 No. 2, pp. 219‐24.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献