Health promotion and complementary medicine: the extent and future of professional collaboration and integration

Author:

Hill Faith

Abstract

PurposeTo explore the professional interface between health promotion (HP) and complementary and alternative medicine.Design/methodology/approachA discussion paper, based on qualitative research involving in‐depth interviews with 52 participants from either side of the interface.FindingsThe current interface is predominantly limited to information exchange but there are innovative examples of partnership working on both sides. Key determinants of future collaboration include: the changing nature of both HP and complementary medicine; the place of science and biomedicine; the role of the individual; and perceptions of health, holism and spirituality. There is a perceived need for professional training and development in the area.Research limitations/implicationsThe discussion presented is based on a small scale, qualitative study and further research is needed to explore the issues raised.Practical implicationsOne‐third of the public in the UK now use complementary medicine and this paper explores ways in which HP may respond to this development.Originality/valueThe paper makes an important contribution to an area where there has so far been little professional debate.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Education

Reference23 articles.

1. Ball, S.J. (1990), “Self‐doubt and soft data: social and technical trajectories in ethnographic fieldwork”, Qualitative Studies in Education, Vol. 3 No. 2, pp. 157‐71.

2. Bartlett, D. and Payne, S. (1997), “Grounded theory – its basis, rationale and procedures”, in McKenzie, G., Powell, J. and Usher, R. (Eds), Understanding Social Research, Perspectives on Methodology and Practice, Falmer Press, London.

3. Correa, A.I. (1999), “Complementary medicine and primary healthcare”, International Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, August, pp. 10‐1.

4. Coward, R. (1989), The Whole Truth. The Myth of Alternative Health, Faber and Faber, London.

5. Delaney, F. (1996), “Theoretical issues in intersectoral collaboration”, in Scriven, A. and Orme, J. (Eds), Health Promotion, Professional Perspectives, Macmillan Press/Open University, London.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Facilitators and barriers to holistic practice, an osteopathic perspective;International Journal of Complementary & Alternative Medicine;2018

2. Holism in Osteopathy – Bridging the gap between concept and practice: A grounded theory study;International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine;2016-12

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3