Challenges and potential improvements in hospital patient flow: the contribution of frontline, top and middle management professionals

Author:

Gualandi RaffaellaORCID,Masella Cristina,Viglione Daniela,Tartaglini Daniela

Abstract

PurposeThis study aims to describe and understand the contributions of frontline, middle and top management healthcare professionals in detecting areas of potential improvement in hospital patient flow and proposing solutions.Design/methodology/approachThis is a qualitative interview study. Semistructured interviews were conducted with 22 professionals in the orthopedic department of a 250-bed academic teaching hospital. Data were analyzed through a thematic framework analytical approach by using an a priori framework. The Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative (COREQ) checklist for qualitative studies was followed.FindingsWhen dealing with a hospital-wide process, the involvement of all professionals, including nonhealth professionals, can reveal priority areas for improvement and for services integration. The improvements identified by the professionals largely focus on covering major gaps detected in the technical and administrative quality.Research limitations/implicationsThis study focused on the professional viewpoint and the connections between services and further studies should explore the role of patient involvement. The study design could limit the generalizability of findings.Practical implicationsImproving high-quality, efficient hospital patient flow cannot be accomplished without learning the perspective of the healthcare professionals on the process of service delivery.Originality/valueFew qualitative studies explore professionals' perspectives on patient needs in hospital flow management. This study provides insights into what produces value for the patient within a complex process by analyzing the contribution of professionals from their particular role in the organization.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Health Policy,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)

Reference37 articles.

1. What is ‘quality improvement’ and how can it transform healthcare?;BMJ Quality and Safety,2007

2. Value in the middle: cultivating middle managers in healthcare organizations;Journal of Management Development,2016

3. Doctor-patient communication: a review and a rationale for using an assessment framework;Journal of Health Organization and Management,2018

4. Patient journeys: the process of clinical redesign;The Medical Journal of Australia,2008

5. Medicine's service challenge: blending custom and standard care;Health Care Management Review,2005

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3