Author:
Dadich Ann,Fulop Liz,Ditton Mary,Campbell Steven,Curry Joanne,Eljiz Kathy,Fitzgerald Anneke,Hayes Kathryn J.,Herington Carmel,Isouard Godfrey,Karimi Leila,Smyth Anne
Abstract
Purpose
– Positive organizational scholarship in healthcare (POSH) suggests that, to promote widespread improvement within health services, focusing on the good, the excellent, and the brilliant is as important as conventional approaches that focus on the negative, the problems, and the failures. POSH offers different opportunities to learn from and build resilient cultures of safety, innovation, and change. It is not separate from tried and tested approaches to health service improvement – but rather, it approaches this improvement differently. The paper aims to discuss these issues.
Design/methodology/approach
– POSH, appreciative inquiry (AI) and reflective practice were used to inform an exploratory investigation of what is good, excellent, or brilliant health service management.
Findings
– The researchers identified new characteristics of good healthcare and what it might take to have brilliant health service management, elucidated and refined POSH, and identified research opportunities that hold potential value for consumers, practitioners, and policymakers.
Research limitations/implications
– The secondary data used in this study offered limited contextual information.
Practical implications
– This approach is a platform from which to: identify, investigate, and learn about brilliant health service management; and inform theory and practice.
Social implications
– POSH can help to reveal what consumers and practitioners value about health services and how they prefer to engage with these services.
Originality/value
– Using POSH, this paper examines what consumers and practitioners value about health services; it also illustrates how brilliance can be theorized into health service management research and practice.
Subject
Health Policy,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
Reference86 articles.
1. Apker, J.
and
Eggly, S.
(2004), “Communicating professional identity in medical socialization: considering the ideological discourse of morning report”,
Qualitative Health Research
, Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 411-429.
2. Argyris, C.
and
Schön, D.A.
(1974),
Theory in Practice: Increasing Professional Effectiveness
, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.
3. Ashby, F.G.
,
Isen, A.M.
and
Turken, A.U.
(1999), “A neuropsychological theory of positive affect and its influence on cognition”,
Psychological Review
, Vol. 106 No. 3, pp. 529-550.
4. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care
(2010), “Australian safety and quality framework for health care”, Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care, Sydney.
5. Australian Data Archive
(2012), “Welcome to ADA qualitative”, Acton, ACT, Australian Data Archive (ADA), available at: www.ada.edu.au/qualitative/home