Finding brilliance using positive organizational scholarship in healthcare

Author:

Dadich Ann,Fulop Liz,Ditton Mary,Campbell Steven,Curry Joanne,Eljiz Kathy,Fitzgerald Anneke,Hayes Kathryn J.,Herington Carmel,Isouard Godfrey,Karimi Leila,Smyth Anne

Abstract

Purpose – Positive organizational scholarship in healthcare (POSH) suggests that, to promote widespread improvement within health services, focusing on the good, the excellent, and the brilliant is as important as conventional approaches that focus on the negative, the problems, and the failures. POSH offers different opportunities to learn from and build resilient cultures of safety, innovation, and change. It is not separate from tried and tested approaches to health service improvement – but rather, it approaches this improvement differently. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach – POSH, appreciative inquiry (AI) and reflective practice were used to inform an exploratory investigation of what is good, excellent, or brilliant health service management. Findings – The researchers identified new characteristics of good healthcare and what it might take to have brilliant health service management, elucidated and refined POSH, and identified research opportunities that hold potential value for consumers, practitioners, and policymakers. Research limitations/implications – The secondary data used in this study offered limited contextual information. Practical implications – This approach is a platform from which to: identify, investigate, and learn about brilliant health service management; and inform theory and practice. Social implications – POSH can help to reveal what consumers and practitioners value about health services and how they prefer to engage with these services. Originality/value – Using POSH, this paper examines what consumers and practitioners value about health services; it also illustrates how brilliance can be theorized into health service management research and practice.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Health Policy,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)

Reference86 articles.

1. Apker, J. and Eggly, S. (2004), “Communicating professional identity in medical socialization: considering the ideological discourse of morning report”, Qualitative Health Research , Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 411-429.

2. Argyris, C. and Schön, D.A. (1974), Theory in Practice: Increasing Professional Effectiveness , Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.

3. Ashby, F.G. , Isen, A.M. and Turken, A.U. (1999), “A neuropsychological theory of positive affect and its influence on cognition”, Psychological Review , Vol. 106 No. 3, pp. 529-550.

4. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care (2010), “Australian safety and quality framework for health care”, Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care, Sydney.

5. Australian Data Archive (2012), “Welcome to ADA qualitative”, Acton, ACT, Australian Data Archive (ADA), available at: www.ada.edu.au/qualitative/home

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3