Is innovation research contingent on competitive context?

Author:

Pehrsson Tobias

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to extend the understanding of innovation research and its contextual boundaries. Design/methodology/approach The paper opts for a systematic review of literature on innovation. Based on research in the agricultural and forest industries, it analyzes differences between research conducted in a competitive context of strong rivalry and research in a context characterized by strong buyer power. In particular, the review compares types of innovation under investigation and the level at which the innovation occurs. Findings It was found that competitive context significantly separates the type of innovation under investigation and innovation at different levels. Thus, the findings provide insights on the importance of competitive context to innovation research. Research limitations/implications The findings have implications for the understanding of the sources and directions of innovation, and the formation of innovation at the firm and industry levels. The review also provides a relevant foundation for further research. Practical implications The review provides a ground for managerial decision-making regarding innovation. A manager wishing to innovate is advised to evaluate the competitive context. The evaluation is crucial, as the context facilitates different types and levels of innovation. Originality/value The review is unique in its emphasis that reviewing studies of innovation requires the consideration of competitive context.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous),Business and International Management

Reference142 articles.

1. Technical innovation in Spain’s wood-based industry: the role of environmental and quality strategies;Forest Policy and Economics,2009

2. Effects of innovation on the European wood industry market structure;Forest Policy and Economics,2014

3. Cognitive representations and institutional hybridity in agrofood innovation;Science, Technology, and Human Values,2004

4. A comparison of innovation in two Canadian forest service support industries;Forest Policy and Economics,2006

5. Technological discontinuities and dominant design: a cyclical model of technical change;Administrative Science Quarterly,1990

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3