Abstract
PurposeThis conceptual paper aims to provide a further understanding of the impact of economic policy uncertainty (EPU), news framing and information overload on panic buying behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic.Design/methodology/approachDrawing on earlier research and news releases about the COVID-19 outbreak, this paper advances testable propositions based on the protection motivation theory and information processing theory.FindingsThis paper infers that the major shift in consumer decision-making towards panic buying is a result of high EPU. International reports have contributed to deepening this uncertainty, and the consequences of this EPU are expected to affect the economic recovery through 2022. Furthermore, the adoption of particular frames of the pandemic has played a key role in the dissemination of misinformation and fake news during the public health crisis and affected purchasing decisions. The study also infers that the perceived threat among consumers is driven by information overload as a source of mistrust towards economic and health information sources.Originality/valueThis paper addresses two theoretical gaps associated with consumer buying behaviour. First, it highlights the impact of EPU, as a macroeconomic indicator, on consumer buying behaviour. Second, this paper is an attempt to integrate theories from different disciplines to foster an adequate understanding of buying behavior during the COVID-19 outbreak period.
Reference72 articles.
1. COVID-19: fear appeal favoring purchase behavior towards personal protective equipment;The Service Industries Journal,2020
2. How do the news media frame crises? A content analysis of crisis news coverage;Public Relations Review,2009
3. Possible controlling measures of panic buying during COVID-19;International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction,2020
4. Panic buying: an insight from the content analysis of media reports during COVID-19 pandemic;Neurology Psychiatry and Brain Research,2020
5. Inflation expectations and readiness to spend: cross-Sectional evidence;American Economic Journal: Economic Policy,2015
Cited by
27 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献