Author:
Liu Yang,Ying Ying,Fagerlin Wen Pan
Abstract
Purpose
– This study aims at developing a better understanding of the different mechanisms that affect technology collaboration portfolio management. How do firms manage their technology collaboration portfolio? Despite some thoughtful scholars have advanced the understanding of the phenomenon of technology collaboration portfolio, there is not much research that has been done in terms of understanding the endeavors of firms when they collectively use a range of actors for the best interests of the firms. Additionally, little attention has been paid to the trade-offs and managing mechanisms for the collaborations between different partners from a portfolio-level perspective, especially in emerging markets.
Design/methodology/approach
– A multiple-case study of two Chinese high-tech firms, an inductive approach.
Findings
– The authors identified three primary mechanisms that underlie successful knowledge creation and application in technology collaboration portfolio context: informally mobilizing boundary-spanning brokers for domestic academic collaborations, formally institutionalizing learning activities for industry collaborations and integrating formal and informal mechanisms for technology collaborations between focused firms and foreign organizations.
Originality/value
– The authors extend the line of organizational ambidexterity literature with a focus on strategic alliance, proposing that firms need to balance academic and industry collaborations from a portfolio level. Moreover, the authors intend to extend the literature of alliance portfolio by suggesting three different learning mechanisms of managing different technology collaborations for the purpose of balancing successful knowledge creation and application.
Subject
General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference59 articles.
1. Bäck, I.
and
Kohtamäki, M.
(2015), “Boundaries of R
&
D collaboration”,
Technovation
, Vol. 10 No. 4. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2015.07.002.
2. Bakker, R.M.
and
Knoben, J.
(2015), “Built to last or meant to end: intertemporal choice in strategic alliance portfolios”,
Management Science
, Vol. 26 No. 1, pp. 256-276.
3. Bjerregaard, T.
(2010), “Industry and academia in convergence: micro-institutional dimensions of R
&
D collaboration”,
Technovation
, Vol. 30 No. 2, pp. 100-108.
4. Burt, R.S.
(2004), “Structural holes and good ideas”,
American Journal of Sociology
, Vol. 110 No. 2, pp. 349-399.
5. Castro, I.
,
Roldán, J.
and
Acedo, F.J.
(2015), “The dimensions of alliance portfolio configuration: a mediation model”,
Journal of Management & Organization
, Vol. 21 No. 2, pp. 176-202.
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献