Author:
Thanzami VanLal,Archer John,Sullivan Cath
Abstract
PurposeThis paper aims to investigate Western studies on beliefs about aggression which have found that men typically hold instrumental beliefs and women hold expressive beliefs.Design/methodology/approachTo investigate whether beliefs about aggression are qualitatively different in an Indian sample, interviews were undertaken with focus groups of 16 and 26‐year‐olds from north‐east India.FindingsIPA analysis indicated that respondents viewed their aggression in terms of: how they might appear; honour or shame; gender roles; and as a loss of self‐control. These findings indicate that beliefs about aggression held in this Indian sample are more complex than can be characterised by the instrumental/expressive dimension.Practical implicationsImplications of these findings for developing more culture‐specific measures of beliefs about aggression are discussed.
Subject
Law,Sociology and Political Science,Social Psychology,Health (social science)
Reference44 articles.
1. Anolli, L. and Pascucci, P. (2005), “Guilt and guilt‐proneness, shame and shame proneness in Indian and Italian young adults”, Personality and Individual Differences, Vol. 39, pp. 763‐73.
2. Archer, J. (1994), “Violence between men”, in Archer, J. (Ed.), Male Violence, Routledge, London, pp. 121‐40.
3. Archer, J. (2004), “Sex differences in aggression in real‐world settings: a meta‐analytic review”, Review of General Psychology, Vol. 8, pp. 291‐322.
4. Archer, J. (2009), “Does sexual selection explain human sex differences in aggression?”, Behavioural and Brain Sciences, Vol. 32, pp. 249‐311.
5. Archer, J. and Haigh, A. (1997a), “Beliefs about aggression among male and female prisoners”, Aggressive Behaviour, Vol. 23, pp. 405‐15.