Author:
Mbzibain Aurelian,Tate Graham,Shaukat Ali
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to examine how national institutional structures affect farmers’ intentions to invest in renewable energy enterprises in the UK agricultural sector.
Design/methodology/approach
– The authors draw on the construct of national institutional profile to identify the regulatory, cognitive and normative institutions affecting entrepreneurial intentions. A postal questionnaire survey of 2,000 farmers was carried out in the West Midlands Region of the UK and 393 usable responses were obtained. Principal component analysis and multivariate data analysis techniques are employed.
Findings
– Cognitive institutions were positively related to intentions. Contrary to expectations, the regulatory institutions were not associated with entrepreneurial intentions. Normative institutions were significantly related to intentions and interestingly, moderated the efficacy of regulatory institutions on entrepreneurial intentions.
Practical implications
– Cognitive and normative institutions may play a far more important role in determining farm entrepreneurship in the renewable energy sector than has been previously considered. Given that much of policy research is often biased towards regulatory institutions, this research shows that the construct of institutional profile offers a useful framework to investigate the effect of national level institutions on entrepreneurship.
Originality/value
– This study contributes to the literature on entrepreneurship in the UK farm sector. It is the first study that demonstrates the role of the country’s institutional profile on farmers’ intentions to invest in RE. The existence of moderation effects between national institutions suggests that research focusing on single dimensions is likely to provide biased results.
Subject
Strategy and Management,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
Reference120 articles.
1. Adams, P.W.
,
Hammond, G.P.
,
Mcmanus, M.C.
and
Mezzullo, W.G.
(2011), “Barriers to and drivers for UK bioenergy development”,
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
, Vol. 15 No. 2, pp. 1217-1227.
2. Aiken, L.S.
,
West, S.G.
and
Reno, R.R.
(1991),
Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions
, Sage publications Inc, London.
3. Alsos, G.A.
and
Carter, S.
(2006), “Multiple business ownership in the Norwegian farm sector: resource transfer and performance consequences”,
Journal of Rural Studies
, Vol. 22 No. 3, pp. 313-322.
4. Alvarez, S. A.
and
Busenitz, L. W.
(2001), “The entrepreneurship of resource-based theory”,
Journal of Management
, Vol. 27 No. 6, pp. 755-775.
5. Alvarez, C.
,
Urbano, D.
,
Coduras, A.
and
Ruiz-Navarro, J.
(2011), “Environmental conditions and entrepreneurial activity: a regional comparison in Spain”,
Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development
, Vol. 18 No. 1, pp. 120-140.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献