Author:
Devapriam John,Alexander Regi T.
Abstract
PurposeTraditionally, services for people with learning disabilities (LD) and forensic needs are underdeveloped. This paper aims to describe the setting up of a tiered model of LD forensic service provision in Leicester, Leicestershire and Rutland, facilitated and driven by a core team of professionals who have the skills and expertise in this area.Design/methodology/approachWith no dedicated funding, this team is virtual in nature and provides support for the community and in‐patient teams in the assessment and management of offenders with LD. A care pathway including a process map is included to represent a visual idea of the referral, assessment, intervention and disposal strategies across the four tiers of service delivery. The service has a unique partnership arrangement with the independent sector that allows for staff training in order to deliver quality outcomes. The virtual team can support patients with learning disabilities and forensic needs in the community and in‐patient settings, both by avoiding unnecessary in‐patient admissions and by improving the treatment outcomes of those discharged from in‐patient settings.FindingsFurther research is required to demonstrate the clinical and social outcomes for offenders with LD using the tiered model of care and care‐pathway.Originality/valueThe virtual team and the LD forensic care pathway were developed because of a gap in service that was identified as part of a mapping exercise and stakeholder discussion. In the current economic climate, additional resources to address this gap in service may not be readily available; therefore, an innovative way of addressing this gap in service was by developing a care pathway for use by community LD teams based on lean principles and evidence‐based medicine and the pooling of specialist skills to develop the virtual team to enable and support the implementation of the care pathway.
Reference30 articles.
1. Alexander, R.T. (2012), “MRC expressions of interest for research consortia to establish a new cohort for intellectual disabilities research: forensic intellectual and developmental disabilities (FIDD)”, personal communication.
2. Alexander, R.T., Chester, V., Gray, N.S. and Snowden, R.J. (2012), “Patients with personality disorders and intellectual disability – closer to personality disorders or intellectual disability? A three‐way comparison”, Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology, Vol. 23 No. 4, pp. 435‐451.
3. Alexander, R.T., Crouch, K., Halstead, S. and Piachaud, J. (2006), “Long‐term outcome from a medium secure service for people with intellectual disability”, Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, Vol. 50 No. 4, pp. 305‐315.
4. Alexander, R.T., Piachaud, J., Odebiyi, L. and Gangadharan, S.K. (2002), “Referrals to a forensic service in the psychiatry of learning disability”, British Journal of Forensic Practice, Vol. 4, pp. 29‐33.
5. Alexander, R.T., Green, F.N., O'Mahony, B., Gunaratna, I.J., Gangadharan, S.K. and Hoare, S. (2010), “Personality disorders in offenders with intellectual disability: a comparison of clinical, forensic and outcome variables and implications for service provision”, Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, Vol. 54 No. 7, pp. 650‐658.
Cited by
15 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献