Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this study is to assess the impact of the shadow economy on three sustainable development indicators while considering the moderating effect of the governance quality, and to highlight the non-linearity of the considered relationship.Design/methodology/approach A sample of 82 countries covering the period from 1996 to 2017. The dynamic first-differenced generalized method of moments (FD-GMM) panel threshold model is implemented to control for non-linearity.Findings The shadow economy hinders sustainable development in countries with low-governance quality, while the opposite result holds in countries with high-governance quality. The critical thresholds triggering the switch from one regime to another vary across the sustainable development indicators. Boosting growth requires enhancing the legal system and the economic dimension of governance, while promoting environmental quality requires the implementation and enforcement of specific environment-friendly regulations.Originality/value The study addresses non-linearity and the moderating effect of governance quality. The use of six governance indicators allows to gauge the ability of each governance dimension to curb the negative effects of the shadow economy. Considering the three objectives of sustainable development allows to identify specific policy recommendations for each of them.
Reference59 articles.
1. Governance, capital and economic growth in the Arab Region;The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance,2019
2. Shadow economy–financial sustainability nexus: the case of Palestine;Journal of Economic Studies,2023
3. Endogenous political institutions;Quarterly Journal of Economics,2004
4. Do institutional quality and financial development affect sustainable economic growth? Evidence from South Asian countries;Borsa Istanbul Review,2021
5. Corruption and sustainable development;International Handbook on the Economics of Corruption,2011