Author:
Liu Tingting,Shao Danping,Li Yulei,Liu Chang-E,He Wei
Abstract
Purpose
Despite an emerging interest in constructive deviance, the exploration of its antecedents is still limited, particularly from an ethical perspective. This study aims to uses moral disengagement theory to investigate how team identification, moral justification and team environmental instability interact to affect employee constructive deviance.
Design/methodology/approach
With survey data collected in two waves from 315 employees of 49 work teams in five service companies in China, this study develops four hypotheses and tests them through hierarchical linear model.
Findings
The survey results support the complete mediating effect of moral justification on the positive impact of team identification on constructive deviance. They also confirm the moderating effect of environmental instability on the relationship between team identification, moral justification and constructive deviance.
Originality/value
This study explores the sources of constructive deviance at team level from the ethical decision-making perspective and reveals the mechanism and contingency factors in the relationship between identity and constructive deviance. In practice, the study findings imply that managers should encourage their employees to cultivate their identification with their team and align their moral justification with the team’s norms especially when the team faces turbulent environment.
Reference35 articles.
1. Ethical dissonance, justifications, and moral behavior;Current Opinion in Psychology,2015
2. Investigating the effects of moral disengagement and participation on unethical work behavior;Journal of Business Ethics,2011
3. The role of ethical climate and moral disengagement in well-intended employee rule breaking;Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management,2016
4. Existentialist perspectives on the problem and prevention of moral disengagement;Journal of Business Ethics,2022