Patient‐specific intervertebral disc implants using rapid manufacturing technology
Author:
de Beer Neal,van der Merwe André
Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to develop a process chain for design and manufacture of endplates of intervertebral disc implants, with specific emphasis on designing footprint profiles and matching endplate geometry.Design/methodology/approachExisting techniques for acquiring patient‐specific information from CT scan data was and a user‐friendly software solution was developed to facilitate pre‐surgical planning and semi‐automated design. The steps in the process chain were validated experimentally by manufacturing Ti6Al4 V endplates by means of Direct Metal Laser Sintering to match vertebrae of a cadaver and were tested for accuracy of the implant‐to‐bone fitment.FindingsIntervertebral disc endplates were successfully designed and rapid manufactured using a biocompatible material. Accuracy within 0.37 mm was achieved. User‐friendly, semi‐automated design software offers an opportunity for surgeons to become more easily involved in the design process and speeds up the process to more accurately develop a custom‐made implant.Research limitations/implicationsThis research is limited to the design and manufacture of the bone‐implant contacting interface. Other design features, such as keels which are commonly used for implant fixation as well as the functionality of the implant joint mechanics were not considered as there may be several feasible design alternatives.Practical implicationsThis research may change the way that current intervertebral disc implants are designed and manufactured.Originality/valueApart from other areas of application (cranial, maxillofacial, hip, knee, foot) and recent research on customized disc nucleus replacement, very little work has been done to develop patient‐specific implants for the spine. This research was conducted to contribute and provide much needed progress in this area of application.
Subject
Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,Mechanical Engineering
Reference30 articles.
1. Auerbach, J.D., Ballester, C.M., Hammond, F., Carine, E.T., Balderston, R.A. and Elliott, D.M. (2010), “The effect of implant size and device keel on vertebral compression properties in lumbar total disc replacement”, The Spine Journal, Vol. 10, pp. 333‐40. 2. Bertagnoli, R. (2005), “Complications and rescue strategies in TDR procedures”, Proceedings of the 20th Annual Meeting of the North American Spine Society (NASS), Philadelphia, PA, USA. 3. Cheh, G., Bridwell, K.H., Lenke, L.G., Buchowski, J.M., Daubs, M.D., Kim, Y. and Baldus, C. (2007), “Adjacent segment disease following lumbar/thoracolumbar fusion with pedicle screw instrumentation – a minimum 5‐year follow‐up”, Spine, Vol. 32 No. 20, pp. 2253‐7. 4. Cinotti, G., David, T. and Postacchini, F. (1996), “Results of disc prosthesis after a minimum follow‐up period of 2 years”, Spine, Vol. 21 No. 8, pp. 995‐1000. 5. De Beer, N., Dimitrov, D. and Van der Merwe, A.F. (2008), “Manufacturing of custom‐made medical implants for cranio/maxillofacial and orthopaedic surgery – an overview of the current state of the industry”, Journal of New Generation Sciences, Vol. 6 No. 2, pp. 1‐15.
Cited by
36 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|