Multi-event ethnography: doing research in pluralistic settings

Author:

Aguilar Delgado Natalia,Barin Cruz Luciano

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to overcome the challenges of doing research in pluralistic settings by performing multi-event ethnographies. The proposal redirects the efforts of longitudinal data collection toward field-configuring events (FCEs), wherein multiple organizations with divergent perspectives over an issue are strategizing in concentrated efforts, at the same time and space. The authors apply traditional ethnographic tools in this understudied setting. On the one hand, these tools allow for a thick description that results in in-depth accounts of actors within FCEs. On the other hand, they provide flexibility because they can be used in complementary ways. Design/methodology/approach – The authors propose the use of three interconnected ethnographic tools in multiple events: shadowing, practitioner's diary and researcher's reflexive journal. Findings – The illustration of an ongoing research project showed how the approach helped the researchers to follow a practitioner in multiple discursive spaces but also to see how the practitioner, even with a different status in a later FCE, transported a deviant practice that denounces his persistent disadvantaged position in the field. The approach delineated here allowed the researchers to open a new window for the appreciation of the activities of marginal actors fighting against hegemonic discourses. Research limitations/implications – The application of the shadowing technique might be challenging. Attention might also be paid to the implications of previous FCEs to current dynamics. Practical implications – The tools developed in this approach have a large potential to have practical implications, as the practitioner accounts of the phenomenon in question are at the center of the data collection and analysis. Originality/value – The proposal contributes to the literature on organizational ethnography by drawing attention to the importance of tracking multiple events, not only different sites, to unveil organizational practices in pluralistic settings as events progress over time.

Publisher

Emerald

Reference40 articles.

1. Anand, N. and Jones, B.C. (2008), “Tournament rituals, category dynamics, and field configuration: the case of the Booker Prize”, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 45 No. 6, pp. 1036-1060.

2. Anand, N. and Watson, M.R. (2004), “Tournament rituals in the evolution of fields: the case of the Grammy Awards”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 47 No. 1, pp. 59-80.

3. Barley, S.R. (2010), “Building an institutional field to corral a government: a case to set an agenda for organization studies”, Organization Studies, Vol. 31 No. 6, pp. 777-805.

4. Czarniawska, B. (2007), Shadowing: and Other Techniques for Doing Fieldwork in Modern Societies, Copenhagen Business School Press, Copenhagen.

5. Dahlén, T. (1997), Among the Interculturalists: An Emergent Profession and its Packaging of Knowledge, Berg Publishers, Oxford, Stockholm.

Cited by 23 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3