Who writes and who responds? Gender and race-based differences in open annotations

Author:

Bakermans Marja,Pfeifer Geoff,San Martín William,LeChasseur Kimberly

Abstract

Purpose Historically minoritized students are routinely silenced in classroom settings. This study aims to explore whether open annotations encourage students with historically minoritized gender/racial/ethnic identities to share knowledge and ideas. In addition, this study explores how the intersectionality of student identities relates to their experiences of open annotation and assess gendered and racialized achievement of student learning objectives. Design/methodology/approach This study uses mixed methods to examine the use of an open annotation tool (Perusall) to foster the redistribution of epistemic authority and more equitable interactions in science, technology, engineering, and math and humanities courses at the intersection of environmental and social justice issues. The study design draws on illustrative case study methods to assist others in seeing the potential and considerations in using a similar pedagogical approach. Findings An open annotation tool like Perusall can foster more equitable interactions for historically minoritized students. Women reported that open annotations deepened knowledge and engagement with the source and their peers. Women of color, in particular, acknowledged the benefits of social annotations as a tool that redistributes epistemic authority. Conversely, men were more likely to comment on dissatisfaction with grading. Originality/value This study suggests the value of open annotation as an effective and accessible method to foster inclusive classrooms. Through examining epistemic authority in social annotations, this study provides a novel approach to addressing the disengagement of historically minoritized students.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Linguistics and Language,Education,Cultural Studies

Reference36 articles.

1. Building community in asynchronous online higher education courses through collaborative annotation;Journal of Educational Technology Systems,2020

2. Association of American Colleges and Universities (AAC&U) (2009), “Reading VALUE rubric”, available at: www.aacu.org/value/rubrics/reading (accessed 27 August 2020).

3. Epistemic injustice and epistemic positioning: towards an intersectional political economy;Current Sociology,2021

4. Framing open educational practices from a social justice perspective;Journal of Interactive Media in Education,2020

5. Social annotation and an inclusive praxis for open pedagogy in the college classroom;Journal of Interactive Media in Education,2020

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3