Abstract
Purpose
This paper aims to analyze the websites of small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and large companies in various industries in Thailand using an automated evaluation tool and explores the association between website quality and business success.
Design/methodology/approach
The data of 357 listed companies, both SMEs and large firms, are collected from the Stock Exchange of Thailand and SEOptimer. Non-parametric statistics are used for data analysis owing to the nonnormality of data.
Findings
Company market values are associated with large companies’ website quality, especially usability, social, security and overall quality. There are differences in the website quality and company market values of large companies in several industries. SMEs generally have lower website quality and company market values than large companies.
Research limitations/implications
This study has fewer numbers of SMEs in each category, which could limit statistical power.
Originality/value
This work is one of few studies assessing internal attributes of websites and links them with the success of companies in various sizes and industries.
Subject
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference72 articles.
1. A. Quinn Jones Center for Excellence (2021), “Grade scale”, available at: www.sbac.edu/domain/146
2. An examination of the comprehensiveness of corporate internet reporting provided by London-listed companies;Journal of International Accounting Research,2007
3. Perceptions and attitudes toward corporate website presence and its use in investor relations in the Jordanian context;Advances in Accounting,2012
4. Exploring the role of website quality and hedonism in the formation of e-satisfaction and e-loyalty;Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing,2017
5. Automated usability evaluation of E-learning websites in Saudi Arabia;Computer Science & Information Technology (CS & IT),2017
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献