Insight into amusement park ride and device safety in the United States

Author:

Avery Brian,Dickson Duncan R.

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to analyze the dimensions and practices that have shaped the safety of amusement rides and devices in the US amusement park industry.Design/methodology/approachThe paper provides an overview and historical examination of key concepts and phenomena.FindingsThe paper concludes that continued amusement ride and device incidents resulting from a lack of nationally accepted and recognized standards will potentially lead to or cause additional negative guest perception and possibly result in regulation from an external agency. This paper identifies areas of concern and makes recommendations to address the potential consequences resulting from staying the current course. It determines that the industry needs to find a collective voice and establish consistent self‐regulating policies in order to curb the incidents rates and avoid federal regulation.Research limitations/implicationsThe paper reports on several secondary research, scholarly as well as industry and government publications and personal communications.Practical implicationsThe safety of patrons visiting amusement parks has become paramount during recent times. Over the last decade or so, the amusement park industry has struggled with the fallout from numerous serious injuries and ride related deaths. This has generated a great deal of interest from patrons, media outlets, and politicians alike. With the continued operation of amusement parks and attractions and the competition of external entertainment options, it is important for the industry to project a solid and evolving image of safety in order to attract and retain patrons.Originality/valueThe paper explores the evolution of amusement ride and safely in the USA.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management,Development

Reference43 articles.

1. AIMS International (2010), available at: www.aimsintl.org/aboutus.php (accessed January 20, 2010).

2. Aldrich, M. (1997), Safety First: Technology, Labor and Business in the Building of Work Safety, 1870‐1939, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD.

3. American Society of Amusement Park Safety and Security (2010), available at: www.asapss.com/.(accessed February 23, 2010).

4. Amusement Park History (2004), “The Roller Coasters of Coney Island”, available at: http://history.amusement‐parks.com/coneycoasters.htm (accessed February 14, 2010).

5. ASTM International (2009), “ASTM Committee F 24”, available at: www.astm.org/F24anniversary/index.html (accessed February 10, 2010).

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3