Various approaches to text representation for named entity disambiguation
Author:
Lašek Ivo,Vojtáš Peter
Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to focus on the problem of named entity disambiguation. The paper disambiguates named entities on a very detailed level. To each entity is assigned a concrete identifier of a corresponding Wikipedia article describing the entity.Design/methodology/approachFor such a fine‐grained disambiguation a correct representation of the context is crucial. The authors compare various context representations: bag of words representation, linguistic representation and structured co‐occurrence representation. Models for each representation are described and evaluated. They also investigate the possibilities of multilingual named entity disambiguation.FindingsBased on this evaluation, the structured co‐occurrence representation provides the best disambiguation results. It showed up that this method could be successfully applied also on other languages, not only on English.Research limitations/implicationsDespite its good results the structured co‐occurrence context representation has several limitations. It trades precision for recall, which might not be desirable in some use cases. Also it is not able to disambiguate two different types of entities, which are mentioned under the same name in the same text. These limitations can be overcome by combination with other described methods.Practical implicationsThe authors provide a ready‐made web service, which can be directly plugged in existing applications using a REST interface.Originality/valueThe paper proposes a new approach to named entity disambiguation exploiting various context representation models (bag of words, linguistic and structural representation). The authors constructed a comprehensive dataset based on all English Wikipedia articles for named entity disambiguation. They evaluated and compared the individual context representation models on this dataset. They evaluate the support of multiple languages.
Subject
Computer Networks and Communications,Information Systems
Reference31 articles.
1. Asahara, M. and Matsumoto, Y. (2003), “Japanese named entity extraction with redundant morphological analysis”, Proceedings of the 2003 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics on Human Language Technology, Vol. 1, Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, pp. 8‐15. 2. Auer, S., Bizer, C., Kobilarov, G., Lehmann, J., Cyganiak, R. and Ives, Z. (2007), “Dbpedia: a nucleus for a web of open data”, The Semantic Web, Vol. 4825, pp. 722‐735. 3. Awang Iskandar, D., Pehcevski, J., Thom, J. and Tahaghoghi, S. (2007), “Social media retrieval using image features and structured text”, Comparative Evaluation of XML Information Retrieval Systems, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 4518, pp. 358‐372. 4. Berners‐Lee, T., Hendler, J. and Lassila, O. (2001), “The semantic web”, Scientific American, Vol. 284 No. 5, pp. 28‐37. 5. Bikel, D.M., Miller, S., Schwartz, R. and Weischedel, R. (1997), “Nymble: a high‐performance learning name‐finder”, Proceedings of the Fifth Conference on Applied Natural Language Processing, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, pp. 194‐201.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. A retrospective of knowledge graphs;Frontiers of Computer Science;2016-09-26 2. Handling Uncertainty in Relation Extraction;Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Knowledge Capture;2015-10-07
|
|