Patients’ experiences of forensic mental health inpatient care: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative literature

Author:

Humphries Karen,Clarke Caroline,Willoughby Kate,Smithson Jake

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to develop an understanding of the experience of secure care from the patients’ perspective. Design/methodology/approach A systematic review of qualitative literature was conducted. The data was sourced from the electronic databases: PsychINFO, CINAHL, Medline and the Web of Science Core Collection using pre-defined search terms. A total of 17 studies, conducted in various countries worldwide and covering high, medium and low secure inpatient settings, were included for review. The analysis involved integrating findings from across the literature and was guided by thematic synthesis. Findings A total of eight themes were generated from the data, three of which provided an understanding of the experience of forensic secure care, and the remaining five themes provided an understanding of the factors which may influence the experience of secure care. Practical implications Developing understanding of patient experience can lead to service improvements, potentially impacting patients’ motivation and engagement and thus reducing admission times, potential recalls and recidivism. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first systematic review to date to exclusively explore the broad topic of the patient experience of secure mental health care.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Law,Psychiatry and Mental health,Applied Psychology,Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Reference72 articles.

1. Patients' experiences of assessment and detention under mental health legislation: systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis;BJPsych Open,2019

2. Being in a seclusion room: the forensic psychiatric inpatients’ perspective;Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing,2020

3. Thematic networks: an analytic tool for qualitative research;Qualitative Research,2001

4. Using thematic analysis in psychology;Qualitative Research in psychology,2006

5. Looking beyond the illness: forensic service users’ perceptions;Of Rehabilitation'. Journal of Interpersonal Violence,2015

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3