Conflict in purchase decision making within couples

Author:

Frikha Azza

Abstract

PurposeThis paper aims to explore conflict and its resolution strategies adopted by Tunisian spouses in the purchase of furniture. This paper also seeks to examine the determinants of the variation in resolution strategies adopted by the couples.Design/methodology/approachFollowing an exploratory study and two focus group discussions, a number of conflict resolution strategies compatible with the Tunisian cultural context are generated and submitted for examination through a survey of 129 couples (N=258 individuals).FindingsThe findings suggest that conflicts are more marked with regard to the non aesthetic aspects of the furniture. The findings also show that the variations in strategies of conflict resolution used by spouses depend on the gender role orientation, the family life cycle and the socio‐demographic characteristics.Research limitations/implicationsThe paper provides insights on the conflict occurring in purchase of furniture and the strategies used by spouses to reach a decision. However, the findings need to be validated on other samples and other products to better apprehend Muslim family interactions.Practical implicationsFor marketers, the findings point to the importance of being aware of the extent of conflict and the used strategies to resolve it. Such knowledge may better refocus marketing efforts towards solving conflicts and help couples reach a purchase decision.Originality/valueThis paper focuses on the decisional dynamics in Tunisian Islamic context.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Marketing

Reference50 articles.

1. Belch, M.A., Belch, G.E. and Sciglimpaglia, D. (1980), “Conflict in family decision making: an exploratory investigation”, in Olson, J.C. (Ed.), Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 7, Association for Consumer Research, Provo, UT, pp. 475‐9.

2. Bokek‐Cohen, Y. (2008), “‘Tell her she's wrong!’ Triangulation as a spousal influence strategy”, Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol. 25 No. 4, pp. 223‐9.

3. Bronner, F. and De Hoog, R. (2008), “Agreement and disagreement in family vacation decision‐making”, Tourism Management, Vol. 29, pp. 967‐79.

4. Burns, A.C. and Gentry, J.W. (1990), “Toward improving household consumption behavior research: avoidance of pitfalls in using alternative household data collection procedures”, in Goldberg, M.E., Gorn, G. and Pollay, R.W. (Eds), Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 17, Association for Consumer Research, Provo, UT, pp. 518‐30.

5. Burns, A.C. and Granbois, D.H. (1977), “Factors moderating the resolution of preference conflict in family automobile purchasing”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 14, pp. 77‐86.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3