Abstract
PurposeThird-party logistics (3PL) companies have experienced an explosion of volume during coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Special tiers have been introduced to provide differentiated levels of service to the customers. However, such changes in an organization reveal and intensify tensions known as paradoxes. The purpose of this research is to identify what paradoxes emerged or have become more salient specifically due to COVID-19 in 3PLs' ground operations and how they are dealt with by ground operation managers.Design/methodology/approachThis is a qualitative study conducted in two phases. Phase one utilizes a questionnaire approach to identify the paradoxes within the 3PLs operating in the USA. Phase two, conducted six months after phase one, follows an in-depth one-on-one interview approach. NVivo 12 is employed to analyze the interview data.FindingsThe results show that new paradoxes did in fact emerge due to the COVID-19 and are mostly related to the performing paradox category. Findings from in-depth interviews show that the 3PL managers focus on keeping safety as priority to manage COVID-19 related paradoxes, along with modifying operational plans, improving communication, investing in training, optimizing hub network, introducing modified/new methods and adapting modified human resource policies.Originality/valueThis paper is among the first known to identify paradoxes within the 3PL operations during the COVID-19 and provides insights into how these paradoxes are dealt with at mid-management level. Findings of this study provide foundations for the development of a theoretical framework on handling paradoxes within 3PLs.
Subject
Transportation,Business and International Management
Reference110 articles.
1. Exploitation- exploration tensions and organizational ambidexterity: managing paradoxes of innovation;Organization Science,2009
2. Organizational restructuring and middle manager sensemaking;The Academy of Management Journal,2004
3. Barge, K. and Andreas, D. (2013), “Communities, conflict, and the design of dialogic con-versation”, in Oetzel, J. and Ting-Toomey, S. (Eds), The SAGE Handbook of Conflict Communication: Integrating Theory, Research, and Practice, 2nd ed., Sage, Thousand Oaks, California, CA, pp. 609-634.
4. Managing dualities in planned change initiatives;Journal of Applied Communication Research,2008
Cited by
14 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献