Author:
Clunie Simone,Parrish Darlene Ann
Abstract
Purpose
As libraries are required to become more accountable and demonstrate that they are meeting performance metrics, an assessment website can be a means for providing data for evidence-based decision making and an important indicator of how a library interacts with its constituents. The purpose of this paper is to share the results of a review of websites of academic libraries from four countries, including the UK, Canada, Australia and the USA.
Design/methodology/approach
The academic library websites included in the sample were selected from the Canadian Association of Research Libraries, Research Libraries of the United Kingdom, Council of Australian University Libraries, Historically Black College & Universities Library Alliance, Association of Research Libraries and American Indian Higher Education Consortium. The websites were evaluated according to the absence or presence of nine predetermined characteristics related to assessment.
Findings
It was discovered that “one size does not fit all” and found several innovative ways institutions are listening to their constituents and making improvements to help users succeed in their academic studies, research and creative endeavors.
Research limitations/implications
Only a sample of academic libraries from each of the four countries were analyzed. Additionally, some of the academic libraries were using password protected intranets unavailable for public access. The influences of institutional history and country-specific practices also became compelling factors during the analysis.
Originality/value
This paper seeks to broaden the factors for what is thought of as academic library assessment with the addition of qualitative and contextual considerations.
Subject
Library and Information Sciences
Reference18 articles.
1. Library websites at historically black colleges and universities;College & Research Libraries,2000
2. Communicating library value – the missing piece of the assessment puzzle;Journal of Academic Librarianship,2014
3. Assessment committees: good practices from ARL libraries;Performance Measurement & Metrics,2016
4. Academic library web sites: current practice and future directions;The Journal of Academic Librarianship,2006
5. In search of services: analyzing the findability of links on CIC university libraries’ web pages;Information Technology and Libraries,1999
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献