Business pedagogy: a qualitative analysis to inform library support

Author:

Ireland Ashley,Thompson Dana StattonORCID,Bourke Brian

Abstract

PurposeThis study seeks to illuminate business instructors' undergraduate pedagogical processes toward developing resources and services to support their teaching.Design/methodology/approachThe authors recruited participants through purposeful sampling and collected data through semi-structured interviews. The transcriptions were coded using a grounded theory approach.FindingsThe findings of this study demonstrate that faculty are motivated to be good teachers and want to engage in opportunities to improve. However, lack of time and teaching with technology pose pedagogical learning curves for faculty. Institutional support for improving teaching is welcomed, but it may also be perceived as white noise against competing priorities and a deluge of information. Lastly, business, as a discipline, may uniquely use informational formats such as multimedia and case studies that may pose a challenge to traditional collection development.Research limitations/implicationsThe project was designed to be exploratory, small-scale and grounded in approach. This study does not purport to be statistically representative nor are the recommendations meant to be prescriptive.Practical implicationsAcademic libraries should be more intentional about positioning subject librarians to provide suggestions for textbooks or other course materials, collecting, organizing and preserving case studies and multimedia and their relationships with publishers that use models that subvert collecting textbooks. Libraries should also partner with technology and pedagogy support units to offer cooperative programming when possible.Originality/valueThis study contributes to the fields of library and information studies, business and education by articulating the unique needs of instructors within the larger contexts of business pedagogy, and the evolving relationship between libraries and undergraduate teaching support.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences

Reference27 articles.

1. Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business (2018), “Business standards: download 2013 eligibility procedures and accreditation standards”, available at https://www.aacsb.edu/accreditation/standards/business (accessed 22 November 2019).

2. American Library Association Institutional Repository (2000), “Information literacy standards for higher education”, available at https://alair.ala.org/handle/11213/7668 (accessed 22 November 2019).

3. Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business (n.d.), “Business standards”, available at: https://www.aacsb.edu/accreditation/standards/business (accessed 22 November 2019).

4. “How many qualitative interviews are enough,2012

5. Positionality: reflecting on the research process;The Qualitative Report,2014

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3