Foreign Exchange Risk Management — The Paradox

Abstract

Two principal forms of cash flow exposure to real exchange rate changes have been identified in the literature, namely transaction exposure and economic exposure. A number of surveys carried out over the last two decades have reported that managers attach more importance to managing transaction exposure than to managing economic exposure. The theoretical literature, on the rare occasions when the issue has been addressed, indicates that while both forms of exposure are linked, economic exposure should be a more significant exposure than transaction exposure for corporations. This paper examines the available evidence from empirical surveys of foreign exchange risk and its management in order to confirm or reject theoretical predictions and the truth of this paradox, and in case of the confirmation of the paradox to suggest a rationale for its existence. In the event the evidence reviewed in this paper confirms the paradox and suggests alternative explanations for its existence.