Grey incidence between KPIs and hospital performance

Author:

Bradea Ioana,Mărăcine Virginia

Abstract

Purpose – Performance indicates how well the activities, operations and business processes of an enterprise are performed. In health care, performance illustrates the quality of medical services and targets the strategic objectives, the efficiency and effectiveness and the obtaining of the desired financial results. In economic analysis, the key performance indicators (KPIs) offers real, relevant and accurate information regarding the performance, using analysis and diagnosis techniques. The purpose of this paper is to discuss grey systems theory in order to bridge the KPIs and the hospital’s performance. Design/methodology/approach – Using the grey systems theory, the impact of seven selected KPIs (the beds utilization rate, the average length of hospitalization, the average cost of hospitalization/day, the proportion of physicians in total staff, the nosocomial infection rate, the death rate and the diagnostic concordance) on the hospital’s turnover is determined. Findings – By analyzing the grey incidence between turnover and several KPIs, for a period of six years, it has been concluded that the greatest impact on performance has the diagnostic concordance and the percent of the physicians in the total staff, followed by the nosocomial infection rate, the average bed utilization rate and the death rate. Research limitations/implications – The considered case study should be extended by including a greater number of hospitals into the analysis. Originality/value – The usage of the grey systems theory in an uncertain and limited information field such as the medical one, is a premier in this field. According to the grey incidence analysis results, the performance of health care institutions depends mainly on the quality of medical staff (that influence the diagnostic concordance, the nosocomial infection rate and the death rate) and on the management ability to attract competent and well-trained physicians, which can conduct in a new approach that should be considered by the hospitals’ managerial staff.

Publisher

Emerald

Reference26 articles.

1. Anderson, E.J. (2014), Business Risk Management. Models and Analysis , Wiley & Sons Publisher, London.

2. Aven, T. (2003), Foundations of Risk Analysis , John Wiley and Sons, London.

3. Beer, S. (1967), Decision and Control , John Wiley, New York, NY.

4. Bradea, I.A. , Delcea, C. and Paun, R. (2015a), “Agile management of the correlated risks”, IBIMA Conference 2014: Crafting Global Competitive Economies: 2020 Vision Strategic Planning & Smart Implementation, Milano, pp. 1818-1823.

5. Bradea, I.A. , Delcea, C. and Paun, R. (2015b), “Indicators for technological and hospital condition risk. Case study Romania”, 25th IBIMA Conference: Innovation Vision 2020: from Regional Development Sustainability to Global Economic Growth, Amsterdam, May 7-8, pp. 334-340.

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3