Abstract
PurposeDisasters continue to be most prevalent and severe for marginalised communities. To reach those furthest behind first, as the global community pledges in the 2030 Agenda, a critical assessment of equity in disaster risk governance is necessary. Yet, the understanding of factors that mediate the capacity of the governance processes to achieve equity ambitions is limited. This paper addresses this gap by proposing and testing a conceptual framework to assess equity in disaster risk governance.Design/methodology/approachThe framework analyses the extent to which institutional relationships and data in risk governance support inclusion and diversity of voice and enable the equitable engagement of communities. The study applied the framework to key risk policies across governance levels in Brazil and Colombia.FindingsThe study finds that institutional awareness of cross-sectoral and -scalar coordination clearly exists. Yet, the engagement of actors further down the governance scale is framed reactively at all scales in both countries. The analysis of the risk data practices indicates that although data integration and sharing are key policy priorities, the policies frame the relations of disaster risk data actors as hierarchical, with data needs determined from the top down.Originality/valueA key contribution of this framework is that its equity view results in a nuanced analysis, thus pointing to the differences between the two countries concerning the factors that mediate these challenges and providing specific entry points for strengthening equity in risk governance policies.
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Health (social science),Building and Construction
Reference49 articles.
1. Alden, C., Morphet, S. and Vieira, M.A. (2010), “Conclusion: one South, many Souths”, in Alden, C., Morphet, S. and Vieira, M.A. (Eds), The South in World Politics, Palgrave Macmillan UK, London.
2. Decolonising knowledge production in disaster management: a feminist perspective;Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal,2022
3. Resilience: new utopia or new tyranny? Reflection about the potentials and limits of the concept of resilience in relation to vulnerability reduction programmes,2012
4. Focusing the meaning(s) of resilience as a descriptive concept and a boundary object;Ecology and Society,2007
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献